ModalAI Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Vinny
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 3
    • Topics 1
    • Posts 556
    • Best 28
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 2

    Vinny

    @Vinny

    ModalAI Team

    30
    Reputation
    77
    Profile views
    556
    Posts
    3
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined Last Online

    Vinny Unfollow Follow
    Qisda Forum ModalAI Team

    Best posts made by Vinny

    • RE: Powering the VOXL 2 as a Standalone Computer

      Hi @Mihir-Bala
      You will need a 2S minimum to satisfy all the requirements of our power module: https://docs.modalai.com/power-module-v3-datasheet/
      Then, you need to do the math to support a 30Watt transient on power up... which equates to a ~5amp burst at the low end of the 2S cell ~6.4V.
      So, if you have a 1,000mAh cell at 2S, that will require a 5C rating.
      If you have a 2,000mAh cell, you need ~2.5C rating, and so on...

      Hope this helped!

      posted in VOXL 2
      VinnyV
      Vinny
    • RE: VOXL2 Microhard Add-On & High Speed Board to Board Connector Compatibility

      Hi @jacobcayetano1
      Apologies for not updating some of the tech docs content about that test board we developed.
      Here are some links:
      https://docs.modalai.com/voxl2-dev-test-board/
      That describes the board and provides schematics and other useful user info.

      Since the test board is a very easy way to destroy your VOXL 2, we keep the sale of it on our Beta page to alert customers that it is an "at-risk" design since you can easily void your VOXL 2 warranties by over-stressing the VOXL2 and introducing ESD and other signal shorting risks.
      That said, here is the purchase link:
      https://www.modalai.com/pages/beta-voxl-2-b2b-breakout-board
      It comes as a kit with many goodies for it's use including cables, a mounting case, and an SD card.

      Now, as far as being able to use Microhard AND J5, we recommend using the standalone version ("dongle") of the Microhard board: https://www.modalai.com/collections/modems/products/mdk-m0048-2 since that will allow you to cascade it off any USB port we have (or one that you include in your design).
      Here are some tips for designing a good USB port with our Voxl ecosystem: https://docs.modalai.com/expansion-design-guide/#usb-expansion-over-j3--j5

      Should you go down the route of designing a custom VOXL 2 plug-in board, we will offer a courtesy review of your schematic to help you along! Feel free to tag me again when you are ready, and we will start an email exchange to share your data so you are not posting it on our forum (unless you wanted to).

      Hope this helped.
      Vinny

      posted in Microhard Modems
      VinnyV
      Vinny
    • RE: Two USB FLIR Boson cameras, one connected to J9 USB-C port...not working

      Hi @serviceberry
      From a HW viewpoint (I am HW team) that sounds reasonable to use the hub the way you suggest. But I know for a fact from personal experience the Boson's are very dependent on VBUS rise times, and a very fast rising 5V supply may not allow it to enumerate properly. We have had an instance in the past where one particular VBUS port rose really fast, and the Boson did not enumerate until we slowed it down. It's one of those situations that may require testing to check. Our J3 10-pin host port has a nice moderate rise time that allows Boson to enumerate. So, when using a Hub, check the VBUS rise times compared to J3.
      I do NOT expect J9 USB-C OTG port to work with Boson.
      The Snapdragon SOC is very smart, and when in OTG mode, it will not provide more than 500mA to any device that enumerates as USB2 which I am lead to believe how the Boson enumerates. if the Boson could enumerate as a USB3 device and the drivers were all present in the Kernel for this, the Snapdragon will give it 900mA over VBUS letting it boot but I think this is a non-starter without the Boson being able to do that.
      Our Boson kits use USB2 only and we provide 1A support to enable them to work without requiring enumeration to negotiate more current, hence why they work on the J3 ports and other expansion board ports that have more than 500mA: https://docs.modalai.com/expansion-design-guide/#usb-expansion-over-j3--j5

      posted in VOXL 2 Mini
      VinnyV
      Vinny
    • RE: Hardware sync between Lepton and Stereo pair

      Hi Nikhil,
      Sorry for our delayed response on this. I just recently joined our forum to help out with more HW centric question.
      As Chad mentioned, this does require HW mods if you do not want the SW driver timestamp method (which would be our recommendation/preference).
      The Lepton signal VSYNC (on GPIO3 most likely is what you are referring to) is running at the VIO voltage of 2.8V to 3.1V per Lepton specs. Our camera sensors are MIPI based, and as such all of those I/Os are at 1.8V, so a level translator would be required which makes connecting these a bit tricky, especially if you need bi-directional support with another sync controller/snoop device. This would need to be something done on a custom interface between the Lepton and the stereo sensors. We do not have such module but would be happy to give further guidance if you need it.
      Thanks!
      Vinny

      posted in VOXL
      VinnyV
      Vinny
    • RE: CAN device support

      @Ansel-Misfeldt Hi,
      The approach we will take for CANBUS right now is similar to what we have. That is, to add CANBUS, it requires the use of a FlightCore Flight Controller. So, with Voxl1, you have Voxl-Flight which integrates the FlightCore, or you add on Flight Core independantly.
      For Voxl2, you can still use a FlightCore, but we have some exciting news coming soon for a newer improved FlightCore, we will likely call it FlightCore V2 🙂
      It will retain CANBUS functionality but has a slew of other upgrades and user improvements added in, all in the same form-factor as FCv1.
      Our Docs portal is just about ready for launch and I think we did a better job up-front on this one to help our customers get running quickly.

      Stay tuned, we should be posting it for sale in the up-coming days!!

      posted in VOXL 2
      VinnyV
      Vinny
    • RE: Doodle Add-on board for VOXL2

      Hi @dlee
      All of our Doodle configs are only using USB2, not UART.
      Hope that answers your questions.
      Thanks!

      posted in VOXL Accessories
      VinnyV
      Vinny
    • RE: Need 2 GPI interrupt inputs on VOXL 2 Mini

      Hi @dougmiller
      If your VOXL 2 Mini is TrustZone Configured for UART over J10, then yes, there are 2 pins available as inputs.
      https://docs.modalai.com/voxl2-mini-connectors/#j10---external-uart
      You can see GPIO_40, GPIO_46 and GPIO_64 are input capable.
      GPIO_40 and GPIO_64 are able to be configured to do wake events in the SoC so they have extra configuration to route to a power manager. Depending on how you write your IRQ routine, that may or may not help.
      Hope this helps!

      posted in VOXL 2 Mini
      VinnyV
      Vinny
    • RE: VOXL2 Mini quad with 1s battery

      Hi @Gary-Holmgren
      Yes, we did design VOXL 2 Mini to be powered by 1S capable source. But, we'll need @Alex-Kushleyev to respond regarding the MINI ESC and how that may need to be tuned for 1S operations.

      For VOXL 2 Mini, here is the way it can work, and the few caveats to explain why we have not offered it yet in exactly that way. If I go in too deep on any electronics jargon, let me know and I'll try to clarify as needed 🙂

      1. The VBAT input of VOXL 2 Mini is by default 3.8V, and that is what the ESC puts out or the "-4" variant of our M0041 power module. This is, as you may know, the ~center point of a 1S battery, representing ~50% SOC.
      2. The V2 Mini can operate wholly in the 1S range for core functions, with the few limitations:
      • The local 3.3V regulator for the UART, GNSS, and all other ports will start to drop-out at around 3.4V. So, even though the core electronics (Snapdragon, Memory, Cameras, USB) will work down to 3.2V, some of our extra circuits will not be happy. If you are powering modules from our 3.3V supply, and they can operate at slightly lower, like 3.2V or 3.1V, and you use our 3.3V as the VDDIO ref, then all is good there.

      • Our 5V boost circuit likes higher voltages. At 3.8V VBATT in, we can supply ~900mA of VBUS (to mimic USB3 VBUS specs). However, as that input VBATT voltage goes down, so will the capacity of that supply. Also, I have a UVLO setting on that rail to trigger the 5V boost to turn OFF if VBAT drops below 2.5V to prevent 1S battery continual drainage (deep discharge) in the event you disable the flight control stuff, but forget to disconnect the battery. However, the ramp ON has a very large hysteresis and it triggers at ~3.5V. So, if you try to start a power ON with less than 3.6V, that 5V boost may never turn ON. Now, if you are not using VBUS, or the 5V on the J19 connector, then it's a do-not-care. But, your ToF use case will require it....

      • TOF is not easy on VOXL 2 Mini, especially the new V2 one. Since we only have that 900mA of 5V (less at lower voltages), the ToF circuit may get starved of it's needed 5V if you start to use other stuff, like USB or lower input VBATT. So, we would only caution you to use 1 ToF module at max, and be prepared to lower exposure and frame rates at VBAT < 3.8V. Our ToF modules use that 5V to generate a local 3.3V, so we do get some power conversion gains, but we just have not done it yet on V2 Mini to capture all the other side effects.

      • Thermal, if you are using our Fan connector, that is powered by that same 5V supply IN mentioned above. So, if that does start to shut down, you'll get a fan OFF condition (possibly ON/OFF throttling like a forced PWM if the 5V comes back on), triggering thermal rise compared to the current 100% duty cycle ON as it is now.

      • Unplanned/Untested Software responses at VBAT <3.8V. As stated, we have not tested this config. The Snapdragon parts are very complex SoCs. When power input starts to go below a certain threshold, the underlying Power MGMT IC's (PMICs) will start to throw interrupts. I think the first one by default is around 3.3V VBATT, but they change based on platforms and chips. So, as we start to approach the "dead battery" SOC%, the system itself may start to react differently and we have not characterized that at all for our builds. It is electrically spec'd to operate, but SW may start nagging and doing weird stuff, like turning off functions such as cameras for example to conserve power.

      • Motor noise!!! This is the biggest one... 1S motors will draw a lot of current to equal similar power demands of higher 2S+ rated motors (there is some V*I correlation here to motor power, so the lower the V, the higher the I). This will result in a lot of noise on the VBATT power rail. These transients can go not only low (droop, triggering resets, 5V OFF, etc) but also too HIGH (back EMF, energy dumps, etc...) potentially damaging components on V2 Mini's front end power system. V2 Mini ABS MAX voltage in is 6V, at which point the PMICs will be damaged. This is the single biggest reason we have not tried to connect a battery directly to our electronics, and always opt to have some type of nice DC/DC to provide solid line-regulation protection. So, if you try to use a direct 1S VBAT, you will need a really good motor-noise transient protection, maybe even a fast acting Zener diode, set to ~5.6V or so. On a side note, we just started including a 5.6V Zener on a new Spin of V2 mini we are working on, but existing M0104 V2 Minis do NOT have that 5.6V zener. Details on a new V2 Mini will follow in the up-coming months, as teased here: https://docs.modalai.com/voxl2-mini-connectors/#j3-usb-3-10-pin

      Those are my first thoughts... If I think of anything else, I will let you know.
      I think it is doable.... V2 Mini was designed with micro-quads in mind, but there is some planning and design considerations that need to be done. We can help you along with the HW side of stuff, but I can't promise we'll have any SW support for issues possibly related to low VBAT in since we have no system to check against or develop with. That is why we only use 2S+ in our platforms (currently).

      Hope this helped!

      posted in Support Request Format for Best Results
      VinnyV
      Vinny
    • RE: M0194 and M0186 CAD files

      Thanks @aheyne for alerting us.
      I had made the updates to our site and the 3D models are now there.
      Let us know if you need any more help.
      Thanks!

      https://docs.modalai.com/pcb-catalog/

      posted in 3D Models
      VinnyV
      Vinny
    • RE: Issue With VOXL 2 When Connected To Microhard Modem Add-on

      Hi @John-Nomikos
      Have you confirmed the issue we pointed to in the other forum post?
      https://forum.modalai.com/topic/1356/sentinel-drone-randomly-reboots?_=1673383475709
      Do you have Kapton or another insulating tape you can place on the J5 120-pin B2B connector on Voxl2 to help confirm the Microhard is not touching J5? We've seen it first hand that it triggers resets.
      I doubt all 3 MCBL-00001 are all bad on you (although we do know they go bad fast from users pulling them out by the cable wires instead of the plastic shroud, but that's another issue).

      Let us know.
      Thanks!

      posted in VOXL 2
      VinnyV
      Vinny

    Latest posts made by Vinny

    • RE: Microhard USB Dongle vs Microhard Add-on with USB Hub

      Hi @george-kollamkulam
      The "Dongle" is standalone and can be paired with any system with USB and 5V.
      The "add-on" specifically plugs into VOXL 2 B2B connectors.

      This info may help you to better understand our Add-on boards:
      https://docs.modalai.com/expansion-design-guide/

      posted in Microhard Modems
      VinnyV
      Vinny
    • RE: M0201/M0153 J2 Pinout

      Hi @18257581
      Sometimes our newer boards are lacking in full documentation, so thanks for your patience.
      We have not publicly posted our uCoax pinouts and not sure yet if we plan to. For now it is required to use our full solution which is host adapters, cables, and sensor boards.
      I'll bring it to the team. But, we are unlikely to open this up since in order for us to test the components, which are very fragile, they need to be bundled together and not separated, so it would actually cost us more (costing our customers more) to test units individually for customer designs.
      Only the Coax cable we sell individually and that is pinned 1:1 with all 26 conductors present unlike some of the other COTS FPV systems.

      However, for JST and other cable-to-board and board-to-board connectors, yes, we need to get that listed.
      The pinout on J4 of M0201 (the replacement for M0153) is in the same Dronecode inspired format we use at ModalAI for UART + I2C, but in this case since it is not UART, it is 2 GPIOS.
      So,
      Pin 1 = 3.3V
      Pin 2 = GPIO_1 (Undefined/Unavailable/Reserved for Future Use)
      Pin 3 = GPIO_2 (Undefined/Unavailable/Reserved for Future Use)
      Pin 4 = GIMBAL_I2C_SDA (3.3V Logic Levels, 2.2K pull-up resistor present)
      Pin 5 = GIMBAL_I2C_SCL (3.3V Logic Levels, 2.2K pull-up resistor present)
      Pin 6 = GND

      posted in VOXL Accessories
      VinnyV
      Vinny
    • RE: M0194 and M0186 CAD files

      Thanks @aheyne for alerting us.
      I had made the updates to our site and the 3D models are now there.
      Let us know if you need any more help.
      Thanks!

      https://docs.modalai.com/pcb-catalog/

      posted in 3D Models
      VinnyV
      Vinny
    • RE: VOXL ESC Mini 4-in-1 not detected issue

      @mkriesel This cable will help if you do not already have one: https://docs.modalai.com/cable-datasheets/#mcbl-00091
      Quick Edit/add: I just noticed our team never had these listed on our shopify site, so they are adding them soon! Thanks!

      posted in VOXL Flight Deck
      VinnyV
      Vinny
    • RE: TOF sensor

      HI @Jetson-Nano
      Yes, absolutely. That was the way we designed it. Some customers need a mounting point, others do not care.
      We refer to it as "M0178" when the mounting hole is present, and "M0171" when it is removed, hence the double markings.

      The edge there is v-scored, so just gently use a small pair of pliers or strong tweezers to remove that semi-circle, and check for burs (frays/splinters of laminate) and gently smooth it with any ESD safe method like a Kim-wipe or anything you have.
      Thanks!

      posted in Image Sensors
      VinnyV
      Vinny
    • RE: Flight Core 2 Firmware update through QGC

      Hi @VictorG
      Our team went back and quarantined all units again and we have some working.
      I'll request they get shipped today, otherwise very soon!!
      Again apologies for all the delays, distractions, and stress on this!!
      Thanks for your patience.

      posted in Support Request Format for Best Results
      VinnyV
      Vinny
    • RE: VOXL2 mini J3 connector (USB3) not working well with external storage for data logging

      Hi @jonathankampia
      Hate to hand you off but this is out of my realm now.... I think @tom is more suited for helping on this front if we are sure it is no longer a HW issue.

      posted in Ask your questions right here!
      VinnyV
      Vinny
    • RE: VOXL2 mini J3 connector (USB3) not working well with external storage for data logging

      Hi @jonathankampia
      Yes, 7.5W will certainly brown out the 5V.
      An external splice is a great way to go/try.

      By chance, to rule out SW concerns, do you have a normal VOXL 2 ("classic") M0154 board and USB expansion with M0130? That M0130 design will supply 2A of VBUS on the 10-pin USB connector.

      Keep us posted.
      Thanks!

      posted in Ask your questions right here!
      VinnyV
      Vinny
    • RE: Flight Core 2 Firmware update through QGC

      Hi @VictorG ,
      That is unacceptable of us. I worked directly with operations to screen 100% of these units so I need to dig in and find out what happened.
      So sorry and we'll get this sorted out.
      FYI @Moderator

      posted in Support Request Format for Best Results
      VinnyV
      Vinny
    • RE: Tap UART TX (RC) pin signal elsewhere

      Hi @TomP
      Looking pretty grim...
      That specific signal is all buried at least 3-7 layers deep directly from that pad and it hits other BGA devices right in the pad.... no exposed traces, no exposed pins at all...
      You'll have to find a different UART port or some other plan B.... sorry.

      posted in VOXL 2 Mini
      VinnyV
      Vinny