ModalAI Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Alex Kushleyev
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 9
    • Topics 0
    • Posts 1595
    • Best 76
    • Controversial 1
    • Groups 1

    Alex Kushleyev

    @Alex Kushleyev

    ModalAI Team

    78
    Reputation
    202
    Profile views
    1595
    Posts
    9
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined Last Online

    Alex Kushleyev Unfollow Follow
    ModalAI Team

    Best posts made by Alex Kushleyev

    • RE: ToF v2 keeps crashing because of high temperature

      @dlee ,

      Yes the new TOF sensor (IRS2975C) is more powerful that the previous generation. What I mean by that is that it can emit more IR power but also heats up more. Emitting more power allows the sensor detect objects at larger distances or objects that are not as reflective.

      In current operating mode, the auto exposure control is enabled inside the sensor itself, which modulates the emitted IR power based on the returns that the sensor is getting. That is to say, the power draw will vary depending on what is in the view of the sensor. If there are obstacles nearby, the output power should be low, otherwise it can be high. At full power, the module can consume close to 0.8-0.9W

      So the first solution, if design allows, is to add a heat spreader to dissipate the heat, which you already started experimenting with. The sensor has a large exposed copper pad in the back for heat sinking purposes for this exact reason. Just be careful not to short this pad to anything, use non-conducting (but heat transfering) adhesive pad between the sensor and heat spreader.

      In terms of a software solution to the issue, we can query the temperature of the emitter. We can also control the maximum emitted power used by the auto exposure algorithm. That is to say, still leave the auto exposure running in the sensor, but limit the maximum power that it is allowed to use.

      We are planning to add some software protection that limits the maximum output power as a function of the emitter temperature. This will require some implementation and testing.

      Meanwhile, please consider using a heat spreader, which will be the best solution if you want to make use of the full sensor's operating range and not have our software limit the output power in order to prevent overheating.

      posted in Image Sensors
      Alex KushleyevA
      Alex Kushleyev
    • RE: Propeller Coefficients for Starling V2

      Hello @Kashish-Garg-0

      we have a curve that is "motor voltage vs rpm", meaning that for a desired RPM, it tells the ESC what average motor voltage should be applied. The average motor voltage is defined as battery_voltage * motor_pmw_duty_cycle. The battery voltage in this curve is in millivolts. Since you are typically controlling the desired RPM, as a user you do not need to worry about what "throttle" or voltage to apply - the ESC does this automatically in order to achieve the desired RPM. this calibration curve is used as a feed-forward term in the RPM controller. The ESC does support an "open loop" type of control where you specify the power from 0 to 100%, which is similar to a standard ESC, but PX4 does not use that ESC control mode.

      By the way, you can test the ESC directly (not using PX4) using our voxl-esc tools (https://gitlab.com/voxl-public/voxl-sdk/utilities/voxl-esc/-/tree/master/voxl-esc-tools) which works directly on VOXL2 or a standalone linux PC (or mac). voxl-esc-spin.py has a --power argument where you specify the power from 0 to 100, which translates directly to the average duty cycle applied to the motor.

      Here is the calibration for the Starling V2 motor / propeller that we use:
      https://gitlab.com/voxl-public/voxl-sdk/utilities/voxl-esc/-/blob/master/voxl-esc-params/mavic_mini_2/mavic_mini_2.xml?ref_type=heads#L63

      Also, you can take a look at this post to see how to interpret those parameters a0, a1, a2 : https://forum.modalai.com/topic/2522/esc-calibration/2

      We also have some dyno tests for this motor / propeller : https://gitlab.com/voxl-public/flight-core-px4/dyno_data/-/blob/master/data/mavic_mini2_timing_test/mavic_mini2_modal_esc_pusher_7.4V_timing0.csv . We are not sure how accurate that is, but it can be used as a starting point. @James-Strawson can you please confirm that is the correct dyno data for the Starling V2 motors?

      Alex

      posted in Ask your questions right here!
      Alex KushleyevA
      Alex Kushleyev
    • RE: Sending Recorded Video Though Camera Server on VOXL2

      @reber34 , perhaps this approach can work for you:

      • record a video encoded at high bit rate (using voxl-camera-server and voxl-record-video . Please note that the output of voxl-record-video will not be in a standard container (such as mp4, etc), but you can fix it with ffpeg : ffmpeg -r 30 -i voxl-record-video.h264 -codec copy videofile.mp4
      • re-encode the video offline with desired codecs / bit rates / resolutions
      • install gst-rtsp-launch which uses gstreamer to set up an RTSP stream https://github.com/sfalexrog/gst-rtsp-launch/
        • you will first need to figure out what gstreamer pipeline to use on voxl2 that will load your video and parse the h264/h265 frames (can use null sink for testing) and then use that pipeline with gst-rtsp-launch which will take the encoded frames and serve them over rtsp stream.
      • gstreamer may be more flexible for tuning the encoding parameters of h264/h265 (compared to voxl-camera-server) and you can also use it in real time later (using voxl-streamer, which uses gstreamer under the hood)

      Another alternative is to use voxl-record-raw-image to save raw YUVs coming from voxl-camera-server and then use voxl-replay and voxl-streamer - the latter will accept YUVs from the MPA pipe and encode them using the bit rate that you want. Note that depending on the image resolution, YUV images will take a lot more space than encoded video, but maybe that is also OK since VOXL2 has lots of storage.

      Alex

      posted in Ask your questions right here!
      Alex KushleyevA
      Alex Kushleyev
    • RE: ESC failure error after SDK 1.1.2 upgrade

      @smilon , voxl-esc-calibrate.py is a script that runs a test procedure in a single motor (with propeller mounted) to calibrate the behavior of the motor / propeller. This procedure only needs to be run once if you change motor or propeller type from a default configuration. The output of this script is just 3 coeficients a1, a2, a3 which you would need to manually enter into an ESC calibration xml file and then upload the xml paramer file to the ESC. Full details about the ESC calibration (when to do it and how) can be found here : https://gitlab.com/voxl-public/voxl-sdk/utilities/voxl-esc/-/blob/master/voxl-esc-tools/calibration.md?ref_type=heads

      If you are using standard motors and propellers (one of standard ModalAI drones), you do not need to run this calibration procedure.

      It sounds like you got it working, I believe voxl-configre-mpa took care of it. You can see what voxl-configure-mpa typically does here : https://docs.modalai.com/voxl-configure-mpa/ , which includes running voxl-esc to upload the latest firmware and params for a specific vehicle.

      posted in ESCs
      Alex KushleyevA
      Alex Kushleyev
    • RE: VOXL ESC V1 or V2

      @wilkinsaf , M0027 was never shipped to any customers, as it was a test version of the ESC. So there should only be M0049, M0117, M0134 and M0129 (mini) ESCs out there. Like Vinny said, all of those ESCs have a blue status LED for each MCU.

      If your ESC has a larger rectangular shape (as opposed to a square), it could be a really old ESC (Atmel-based, not STM32-based), which we do not really support any more. I hope this helps!

      Alex

      posted in VOXL 2
      Alex KushleyevA
      Alex Kushleyev
    • RE: OV7251 RAW10 format

      Hello @Gicu-Panaghiu,

      I am going to assume you are using VOXL1, since you did not specify..

      We do have RAW8 and RAW10 support for OV7251. The selection of the format has to be done in several places.

      First, you have to select the correct camera driver, specifically..

      ls /usr/lib/libmmcamera_ov7251*.so
      /usr/lib/libmmcamera_ov7251.so
      /usr/lib/libmmcamera_ov7251_8bit.so
      /usr/lib/libmmcamera_ov7251_hflip_8bit.so
      /usr/lib/libmmcamera_ov7251_rot180_8bit.so
      /usr/lib/libmmcamera_ov7251_vflip_8bit.so
      

      there are 5 options and one of them is _8bit.so which means it will natively ouptput 8bit data (all others output 10 bit data).

      the driver name, such as ov7251_8bit has to be the sensor name <SensorName>ov7251_8bit</SensorName> in /system/etc/camera/camera_config.xml.

      You can check camera_config.xml for what sensor library is used for your OV7251.

      When you run voxl-configure-cameras script, it will actually copy one of the default camera_config.xml that are set up for a particular use case, and I believe it will indeed select the 8bit one - this was done to save cpu cycles needed to convert 10bit to 8bit, since majority of the time only 8bit pixels are used.

      Now, you mentioned that HAL_PIXEL_FORMAT_RAW10 is passed to the stream config and unfortunately this does not have any effect on what the driver outputs. If the low level driver (e.g. libmmcamera_ov7251_8bit.so) is set up to output RAW8, it will output RAW8 if you request either HAL_PIXEL_FORMAT_RAW8 or HAL_PIXEL_FORMAT_RAW10.

      So if you update the camera_config.xml to the 10bit driver and just keep the HAL_PIXEL_FORMAT_RAW10 in the stream config (then sync and reboot), you should be getting a 10 bit RAW image from the camera. But since the camera server is currently expecting 8 bit image, if you just interpret the image as 8 bit, it will appear garbled, so you will need to handle the 10 bit image (decide what you want to do with it) in the camera server.

      posted in Image Sensors
      Alex KushleyevA
      Alex Kushleyev
    • RE: Cannot change TOF framerate

      The ipk is available here now : http://voxl-packages.modalai.com/stable/voxl-hal3-tof-cam-ros_0.0.5.ipk - you should be able to use the launch file to choose between two modes (5=short range and 9=long range) and fps, which are listed in the launch file.

      posted in Ask your questions right here!
      Alex KushleyevA
      Alex Kushleyev
    • RE: VOXL ESC Mini 4-in-1 Current per Motor

      @Moderator said in VOXL ESC Mini 4-in-1 Current per Motor:

      Is it possible to step up voltage?

      Can you please clarify the question? 🙂

      Mini ESC is designed for small drones ( < 500g ). The ESC has been tested to handle 15A continous at 15V input continuously (60+ seconds), but with full direct air flow from propellers. This would simulate a full throttle "punch-out" on a small FPV drone (high current, but also lots of direct airflow = cooling). Do not use this ESC if the drone needs 10-15A per channel just to hover. Use it in application where hover current per motor is less than 5A (ideally 2-3A which is very typical) and absolute maximum continuous current per motor can be 10-15A.

      For example, motors used for small FPV drones often are around 1306 size (3-4S Lipo). Those motors are usually rated for up to 10-12A continous (for 30-60 seconds). Larger motors can be used as long as maximum motor current does not exceed 10-15A (still 2-3A at hover) and there is sufficient cooling.

      Always check ESC board temperature during initial flights / tuning. Temperature must stay below 110C at all times (critical), typically in the range of 40-70C for most applications. The ESC will most likely fail above 125C.

      Temperature of the ESC board is the limiting factor because the board is so small. Mosfets can handle a lot of current as long as they don't overheat. So the design of the drone is very important (either use low current so that temperature is not an issue or properly design air flow from propellers and/or add heat spreader to keep the ESC board temperature in normal range for higher current draw applications).

      ESC provides real time temperature feedback and it can be viewed in PX4 / QGC. Additionally, the PX4 logs contain the temperature information.

      posted in ESCs
      Alex KushleyevA
      Alex Kushleyev
    • RE: (Platform 1.0.0) Bug in the most recent VOXL2 ESC Firmware (Random motors reverse directions each arm)

      @John-Nomikos-0 , the ESC params / settings are completely separate from PX4. PX4 cannot modify the ESC params - all the ESC configuration is done through our tool voxl-esc. You should make sure the correct ESC params are installed before starting PX4.

      PX4 just has the interface to control the ESC by sending the RPM commands to spin the motors.

      Alex

      posted in VOXL 2
      Alex KushleyevA
      Alex Kushleyev
    • RE: Next-gen TOF sensor specs

      @david-moro

      If you look at this image, https://docs.modalai.com/M0169/#image-of-working-module it shows the TOF sensor (right) and the M0169 adapter (left).

      The weight of the TOF module is 0.72g and weight of M0169 adapter is 0.93g.

      This particular combo requires an external power input (4-5V as described here https://docs.modalai.com/M0169/#current-consumption). "External" in this case means additional power source besides the camera connector. The additional power input connects into M0169 via 2-pin JST connector.

      The worse case power consumption is ~0.9W, which is a lot for such small module. The current draw plot shows a typical 5hz operation at maximum "exposure", which sends out 8 6-ms pulses of 1.0-1.1A (at 3.3V). so that is 1.1A * 3.3V * (5hz * 8 * 0.006s) = 0.87W. If you select 15Hz, the maximum exposure (emitter pulse time) will go down from 6ms to 2ms, so the maximum total power will remain the same.

      This module would definitely require a heat spreader to operate continuously at this power. However maximum power output (even in auto exposure mode) can be limited to accommodate specific power dissipation capabilities. Additionally, the temperature of the emitter is reported from the TOF sensor.

      Due to additional complexities that come with this new module (need for external power, which cannot be obtained from the camera connector) and heat management, we are working on the solution that would provide a positive user experience, so hence the delay.

      I will check on the ETA

      posted in Image Sensors
      Alex KushleyevA
      Alex Kushleyev

    Latest posts made by Alex Kushleyev

    • RE: How to attach a servo motor to VOXL 2

      @ashwin

      Do you need to be able to control the servo from PX4 or it would be acceptable to have an API you could use on the CPU / Linux on VOXL2 ?

      Alex

      posted in Ask your questions right here!
      Alex KushleyevA
      Alex Kushleyev
    • RE: temperature issue with voxl 2

      @Jetson-Nano , 60C is not an issue for embedded devices (throttling limit is around 95C, at which point the CPU will start reducing frequency to avoid overheating).

      However, you mention that the temperature can reach 90C. Please note that the camera server itself most likely is not the main cause of the CPU temperature, but the consumers of the image frames may be using significant CPU.

      You should identify the main causes of temperature rise by looking at output of top to see rough cpu usage of each process, but also try disabling mapper or openvins or hires image processing (if any).

      Also, without any cooling, it is not a surprise that VOXL2 could overheat if its cpu / gpu load is very high. The SoC cannot run without cooling at full power. Airflow during flight usually provides significant cooling and you can manage the system load when not in flight or add cooling for stationary use cases (lack of air flow from propellers),

      Alex

      posted in VOXL 2
      Alex KushleyevA
      Alex Kushleyev
    • RE: Hadron Boards to order

      @h3robotics

      The M0159 has been replaced by M0202, which has identical functionality but slightly smaller outline to fit the Hadron better. M0202 will be officially available shortly.

      Here are the CAD files:
      M0181
      M0202

      Alex

      posted in Image Sensors
      Alex KushleyevA
      Alex Kushleyev
    • RE: Starling 2: TOF sensor not recognized by VOXL Portal

      @Hector-Gutierrez , since you have a standard camera configuration, you should run the following command to configure your VOXL2 for C27:

      voxl-configure-cameras 27
      

      This command should copy the correct sensormodule files to /usr/lib/camera and set up a default config in /etc/modalai/voxl-camera-server.conf for this camera arrangement.

      Alex

      posted in Starling & Starling 2
      Alex KushleyevA
      Alex Kushleyev
    • RE: LiDAR LightWare SF20/C integration on I2C3

      @george-kollamkulam That port is internally connected to the 5V coming from the main VOXL2 power (which is technically 5V 6A). Obviously you would be limited by the connector pins, which are rated around 1A max continuous. Also, drawing too much from this pin, can bring down the whole VOXL2 (if that 5V output on J19 is shorted to GND, for example).

      posted in Ask your questions right here!
      Alex KushleyevA
      Alex Kushleyev
    • RE: LiDAR LightWare SF20/C integration on I2C3

      @george-kollamkulam , is there any reason why you cannot use 5V from J19 on VOXL2?

      Enabling 5.0V output on the Mini ESC would need a firmware update, so if you can stay closer to the standard configuration, it will be easier to maintain (for you and for us as well).

      Alex

      posted in Ask your questions right here!
      Alex KushleyevA
      Alex Kushleyev
    • RE: VOXL FPV Racing 4-in-1 ESC with flight core v2 and voxl2

      @Jetson-Nano , please confirm the ESC is working by using a usb to serial connection directly to the esc and voxl-esc Python tools on a Linux PC or VM.

      You can run simple commands to detect the esc and perform spin tests if needed, this is all documented.

      https://docs.modalai.com/voxl-escs/faq/

      If the esc is ok, then you will need to double check the FC v2 setup.

      Alex

      posted in Ask your questions right here!
      Alex KushleyevA
      Alex Kushleyev
    • RE: voxl-open-vins-server

      @Jetson-Nano , I am not the best person to answer questions regarding open-vins. Let me double check with other team members.

      Also, can you please clarify your question "which is the preferred imu for the extrinsic when I am using voxl 2 + fc v2 + M1073" -- what do you mean which IMU? VOXL2 has two IMUs - one is used by PX4 for flight (accessed from DSP) and the second IMU is connected to the CPU. The latter is used for all VIO processing.

      Alex

      posted in Ask your questions right here!
      Alex KushleyevA
      Alex Kushleyev
    • RE: Spare landing leg for PX4 Autonomy Development kit

      @goswamid ,

      Yes we do sell those parts. Please contact us via online form. https://www.modalai.com/pages/contact-us

      The part number you will need is M10000524

      Alex

      posted in Ask your questions right here!
      Alex KushleyevA
      Alex Kushleyev
    • RE: OV64B Configuration

      @smiley , we made a small adjustment to the M0159 board to make it fit into the Hadron better (board outline). That was a small board re-spin (same functionality). Checking on the status..

      Alex

      posted in Ask your questions right here!
      Alex KushleyevA
      Alex Kushleyev