Hi @Janelletran
That is an exciting effort, and yes we are proud of our work with JPL as well for the CADRE program.
As you may very well guess, JPL is in a unique position to stress test all components and sub-systems above and beyond published specs with regularity. It is one of the reasons why JPL is so successful.
In the case of CADRE, as you may have guessed, we notified the JPL teams that VOXL is rated for commercial use of 0C to 55C ambient due to component ratings of 85C operating max.
However, JPL being JPL, they have mostly pushed past those limits in many areas, and they have many reports showing success well outside those ranges. Unfortunately, we are not allowed to share that data.
All that said, we only have data on 0-55C for VOXL. We have made efforts to ensure VOXL 2 is a wider range of 0-70C. However, as you may guess, those limits are insufficient for JPL and the only way to validate the system for your application is to test test test. Your colleagues at JPL may already have all the data you need for VOXL or VOXL 2 to continue with your research.
For current integration and ease of use, along with the horsepower you may need, we'd encourage VOXL 2 for your use case. The expandability is much broader than VOXL, and will be supported for years to come . VOXL is already listed as NRND on our website for the lifecycle status.
I hope this was helpful, and please keep using the forum for any questions that may come up.