@taiwohazeez , Once thing i noticed is that you don't have en_misp set to 1 for the tracking_front camera. I don't think this is the reason for the failure, but it should be set to 1. Meanwhile, please try to identify which camera is causing the issue by disabling cameras and testing camera server ( you can set enabled flag to 0, so that this camera is not started. Also, when you installed SDK 1.6.2, did you run voxl-configure-cameras and which option did you select for the camera configuration? Alex

@taiwohazeez , It is possible, as the output suggests that the motion blur is causing the issue. You can override the auto exposure algorithm and reduce the exposure down to 5ms or so to help with this. There are two ways of doing this: using voxl-portal : open the regular camera view for your tracking camera, click a small check box in the bottom left corner to enable the advanced control panel. This will allow you to set the exposure and gain, you can try to set the gain to the max (should be 1600 (16x) for AR0144) and then play around with exposure to have the lowest exposure that still makes the checker board clear. After you are done changing the manual exposure, you can run the calibrator and switch the voxl-portal to the calibrator output. please note that until you touch the sliders for exposure and gain, they will not correspond to the current values that are being used by auto-exposure algorithm. from command line you can send a command to camera server: voxl-send-command tracking_front set_exp_gain 5.0 1600 (this would set exposure to 5.0ms and gain to 1600 ISO (16x)) Please note that the manual exposure settings / mode will persist until you reboot the camera server. Alex

@Alex-Kushleyev This unit was sent in on RMA 796.

@Moderator Thank you for the link. But he says he needs to get on a call with the technical team. It's a year already and I still don't know much about the drones (which may be from my end, I don't know), but he wants to handle this himself this time around and get all necessary information on a single call sometime early in January 2026. Kindly let me know if this is possible, and how to go about it. Thanks

@tom This is the output voxl2:/$ voxl-version ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── system-image: 1.8.06-M0054-14.1a-perf kernel: #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Oct 22 04:13:18 UTC 2025 4.19.125 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── hw platform: M0054 mach.var: 1.0.1 SKU: MRB-D0014-4-V1-C27-T9-M0-X0 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── voxl-suite: 1.6.2 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Packages: Repo: http://voxl-packages.modalai.com/ ./dists/qrb5165/sdk-1.6/binary-arm64/ Last Updated: 2025-12-25 03:58:02 List: libfc-sensor 1.0.8 libmodal-cv 0.6.0 libmodal-exposure 0.1.4 libmodal-flow 1.0.3 libmodal-journal 0.2.7 libmodal-json 0.4.8 libmodal-pipe 2.14.8 libqrb5165-io 0.5.0 libvoxl-cci-direct 0.3.3 libvoxl-codec 0.0.1 libvoxl-cutils 0.1.6 modalai-slpi 1.2.2 mv-voxl 0.1-r0 qrb5165-bind 0.1-r0 qrb5165-dfs-server 0.2.0 qrb5165-imu-server 1.2.3 qrb5165-mini-tof-server 0.2.2 qrb5165-rangefinder-server 0.1.6 qrb5165-slpi-test-sig 01-r0 qrb5165-system-tweaks 0.3.11 qrb5165-tflite 2.17.2 voxl-bind-spektrum 0.1.1 voxl-camera-calibration 0.6.1 voxl-camera-server 2.2.17 voxl-ceres-solver 2:2.0.0-2 voxl-configurator 1.0.10 voxl-cpu-monitor 0.7.4 voxl-docker-support 1.3.1 voxl-elrs 0.4.14 voxl-esc 1.5.7 voxl-feature-tracker 0.5.2 voxl-flow-server 0.3.6 voxl-gphoto2-server 0.0.10 voxl-io-server 0.0.6 voxl-jpeg-turbo 2.1.3-7 voxl-lepton-server 1.3.3 voxl-lepton-tracker 0.0.4 voxl-libgeographic 1.0.0 voxl-libgphoto2 0.0.4 voxl-libuvc 1.0.7 voxl-logger 0.6.0 voxl-mavcam-manager 0.6.0 voxl-mavlink 0.1.6 voxl-mavlink-server 1.4.12 voxl-microdds-agent 3.0.0-0 voxl-modem 1.2.2 voxl-mongoose 7.19.0 voxl-mpa-to-ros 0.3.9 voxl-mpa-to-ros2 0.0.7 voxl-mpa-tools 1.5.5 voxl-open-vins-server 0.5.7 voxl-opencv 4.5.5-3 voxl-osd 0.2.1 voxl-portal 0.8.4 voxl-px4 1.14.0-2.0.124 voxl-px4-params 0.8.11 voxl-qvio-server 1.2.2 voxl-remote-id 0.0.9 voxl-reset-slpi 0.0.1 voxl-ros2-foxy 0.0.1 voxl-state-estimator 0.0.5 voxl-streamer 0.8.0 voxl-suite 1.6.2 voxl-tag-detector 0.0.5 voxl-tflite-server 0.5.0 voxl-utils 1.4.9 voxl-uvc-server 0.1.7 voxl-vision-hub 1.9.19 voxl-vtx 1.7.6 voxl-wavemux 0.0.3 voxl2-io 0.0.3 voxl2-security-hardening-utls 1.0-r0 voxl2-system-image 1.8.06-r0 voxl2-wlan 1.0-r0 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── voxl2:/$

@colombe-ai currently 30 business days is quoted on the website: https://www.modalai.com/products/starling-2-max It typically should ship more quickly than that though, likely 2-3 weeks There is no overnight shipping option as all of the drones are built to order

@colombe-ai You can find the batteries here: https://www.modalai.com/products/m10000538 Any 2S LiIon hobby charger will work. Something like this is all you need: https://www.amazon.com/ISDT-608PD-Battery-Charger-Discharger/dp/B0CM9BFQSX Handheld transmitter depends on the configuration of the drone. You can order the drone with a pre-bound charger ready to fly from the website. The main debugging cable is a standard USB-C cable

Hello @HsinSWT , When i see results like this, i would say there is probably 90% chance that the motor is bad. Unfortunately, there is a chance that the ESC is bad as well, and there is no good way to check the ESC without a known good motor (however the ESC failure is unlikely). As I mentioned in the previous post, if you had a milli-ohm meter, you could test the motor winding resistance to confirm whether the motor is good or bad. A tool like that measures resistance with high precision (similar to a regular Ohm meter). However, if you don't have one, it may not be worth buying it.. You will not be able to measure the winding resistance of these motors correctly with a regular Ohm meter. However, you will be able to detect a complete open circuit (which could be the case, maybe worth trying). If testing resistance using a regular Ohm meter, any two connections between the 3 motor phases will read 0 ohm (or close to that). If a wire is broken, then you can detect it. The Starling 2 motor (3000kV) has around 0.360 - 0.370 Ohm phase-to-phase winding resistance. In order to confirm that the ESC is working properly, you could temporarily connect one of the working motors to the ESC Channel 0 and do the same spin test (using voxl-esc tools), just to confirm that the ESC Channel 0 is working fine. In order to fix the issue, you could order a new motor and replace it yourself (will be a lot cheaper): https://www.modalai.com/products/starling-2-replacement-parts?variant=49707605393712 You could also send the whole drone back for repair (https://www.modalai.com/rma) Alex

@colombe-ai , when you flash a voxl2 SDK, there should be an option to set it up from scratch. did you try it? https://docs.modalai.com/voxl-suite/ Alex

@Eric-Katzfey I updated to SDK 1.6.0, which fixed the power display issue. I was still getting no valid local position preflight fail, but after I ran apt update && apt upgrade, things seemed to work.

@jmltt SDK testing for Sentinel ended at SDK 1.4.0 That doesn't mean that newer releases won't work, it just means we don't put it through the SW QA testing cycles that we do with our newer platforms. You likely won't see any major performance improvements on Sentinel with newer SDK releases but there may be some nice quality of life additions such as helper scripts, voxl-portal updates and others. If you have any questions about any specific packages feel free to ask.

@Muqing-Cao Here you go: https://gitlab.com/voxl-public/voxl-sdk/services/voxl-vision-hub/-/blob/dev/src/vio_manager.c?ref_type=heads#L450

@roy-crosthwaite see here: https://www.modalai.com/pages/rma

@Jakub-Tvrz said in Starling 2 Max for indoor: We haven't bought anything yet, but we are deciding what will be the best for our warehouse inventory application. Of course, we considered the ToF option. But you still say: "however, it is not... great" - does that mean that Starling 2 is better for our application? Or does Dual vs Triple camera for Visual Inertial Odometry also have an impact? Reply Depends fully on your use case. I will say that PX4's instance of obstacle avoidance is not fantastic, but it is better than nothing. In my opinion I would go w/ the model that has all the bells and whistles in case you need the hardware and decide to develop your own collision avoidance or somethign of that nature.

@taiwohazeez Can you post a video of it trying to fly?

@Zachary-Lowell-0 Hi, let me explain what i meant by hovering mode. There is a 3-way toggle switch beside the kill switch in the transmitter (toggling down switches to position mode, toggling up switches to the autonomous mode, while toggling to the middle maintains the drone flight positioning. I have another drone that when the button is switched to the middle, it maintains the drone position (thats what i meant by hover mode). My other starling 2 drones maintains their positions when the switch is toggled to the middle position, but this particular starling 2 drone doesnt.

Were you able to solve this issue and unbrick the device? Can you explain how?