Topics created by cbay

@cbay , yes this should work.

Whenever you add cameras of the same type, you should always check for possible I2C (CCI) conflicts. If you look here https://docs.modalai.com/M0188/#image-sensor-interfaces , the sensor IDs 0,2,3,6 (which is what you use) use unique CCI buses 0-3, so that is all good.

If you used ID 1, it would conflict with with another AR0144 on ID6 (both use CCI1)

One last thing to check is the sensor sync.

if you see fsin in the configuration of the sensor (and name of the sensormodule in /usr/lib/camera/), it means it is set up as a sync slave currently you have the IDs 0 and 6 set up as sync slaves, but ID 2 and 3 as free-running

There are two issues enabling sync'ed drivers for AR0144 in ID 2 and 3:

the driver is provided only for ID2 in : /usr/share/modalai/chi-cdk/ar0144-fsin/ - this is easy to fix ID1 and ID3 on M0188 do not have the sync line connected to the camera connector this is easy to fix by installing a 0-ohm resistor, which is DNI by default.

Depending on your requirements for VIO (which VIO are you using?), you may or may not need the cameras synchronized.

Please let me know your requirements and we can go from there..

Alex

@cbay voxl-fpv-px4 is based on voxl-px4 but has some custom tuning code / parameters for our fpv drones that isn't in voxl-px4. So, it's kind of a superset. But there isn't anything related to low level i2c drivers so I have no idea how that could be causing this issue.

@Alex-Kushleyev Found the reason why it was skipping. In /px4-firmware/src/lib/parameters/CMakeLists.txt there is a line that skips all modules that match 'pwm_out'. I was able to disable that for PCA9685. Once I disabled the module.yaml file being skipped it worked. No need for the .c file (which makes sense, that is just the old way to do the .yaml)

Carson—

I'm trying to do the same: create a Kicad symbol for VOXL 2 as a module (ie, no internal details, just interfaces). Have you had any luck in locating something?

Best,

—John

@Alex-Kushleyev sure thing. As per your suggestion, I modified voxl-lepton-server by moving all the Lepton camera-specific logic into a C++ class and added locks to any I2C operations to prevent race conditions. I then just created 2 instances of the LeptonCamera class I made which parse and publish the camera feeds to their own pipes which I can view in voxl-portal.

I didn't need to disable any I2C interface for the second Lepton. I'm not too sure what you were referring to by that.

In regards to the horizontal line artifacts, those don't seems to consistently appear and I don't know what causes it. I'll investigate it further.

My next steps are to get the Leptons working with voxl-open-vins-server. One question I had was that our VOXL 2 Mini appears to be running a service called voxl-lepton-tracker however I cannot find the source code for this anywhere on the voxl public GitLab. Was it removed or hidden?

@cbay ,

As long as the Boson / Boson+ 640 (or 320) supports MIPI output, it should work. We believe that some Boson models do NOT have MIPI support (HW limitation) but all Boson+ do have MIPI support. Please check with your vendor to make sure MIPI output is supported.

Also, did you actually mean M0187, or something else? M0187 is an adapter for a Flir Lepton : https://docs.modalai.com/M0187/

Alex

@cbay ,

We support any camera that is compatible with UVC (plugged into a usb port). Please look into voxl-uvc-server. https://docs.modalai.com/voxl-uvc-server/

Regarding NIR, have you considered using a regular camera (most cameras are sensitive to NIR) and install a lens with a NIR pass filter (if you dont want to see visible light)? Then you could use one of our hi-res cameras like IMX412 or IMX664. I can get you spectral response plot of those sensors if you need.

Alex