Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Collapse
Brand Logo

ModalAI Forum

  1. ModalAI Support Forum
  2. Ask your questions right here!
  3. Support Request Format for Best Results
  4. M0181 Pin Out and Electrical Diagram

M0181 Pin Out and Electrical Diagram

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Support Request Format for Best Results
flir
23 Posts 6 Posters 3.4k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • VinnyV Vinny

    Hi @Nando75
    Yes, that is a fundamental limit of ALL uCoax that is not Twinax Impedance controlled conductors. Therefor all IPEX, Hirose, Molex, TE, etc (you name it) coax will fundamentally be limited in performance compared to true 100-ohm differential controlled impedance you can get from flex circuits or Samtec's Twinax. It is one of the many tradeoffs in our design space we need to make. As such, that is why we are firm on keeping the coax short and we do not sell any option longer than 180mm since at some point that small impedance offset and tolerances between two 50-ohm conductors compared to a true coupled 100-ohm may play a role.

    Hope this helps you.
    Thanks!

    N Offline
    N Offline
    Nando75
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    Thanks, @Vinny, for your help.

    Just to confirm, you're suggesting that an IPEX cable assembly like this one (https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/i-pex/81457-100B-02-D/22108838?gclsrc=aw.ds&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=203759898&gbraid=0AAAAADrbLljG_0DgosYmSjn-L6wfiInDx&gclid=CjwKCAjwxrLHBhA2EiwAu9EdMyI0xVm4X54JIAOikP3zqiHT_KgnCN1m9s6Gd_ba0VRVhewe2lowKxoCYHAQAvD_BwE), with a length of 200mm (slightly longer than your suggested 180mm), could work if each line of the differential pair is carried over a separate coaxial cable.

    Regards,

    Fernando

    VinnyV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Nando75

      Thanks, @Vinny, for your help.

      Just to confirm, you're suggesting that an IPEX cable assembly like this one (https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/i-pex/81457-100B-02-D/22108838?gclsrc=aw.ds&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=203759898&gbraid=0AAAAADrbLljG_0DgosYmSjn-L6wfiInDx&gclid=CjwKCAjwxrLHBhA2EiwAu9EdMyI0xVm4X54JIAOikP3zqiHT_KgnCN1m9s6Gd_ba0VRVhewe2lowKxoCYHAQAvD_BwE), with a length of 200mm (slightly longer than your suggested 180mm), could work if each line of the differential pair is carried over a separate coaxial cable.

      Regards,

      Fernando

      VinnyV Offline
      VinnyV Offline
      Vinny
      ModalAI Team
      wrote on last edited by
      #13

      Hi @Nando75
      If it was less than 200mm, yes. 200mm is at your own risk, and make sure your SW team knows how to reach out and request slower MIPI CLK speeds in the event of signal integrity failures (camera failures).
      Keep us posted.
      Thanks!

      N 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • VinnyV Vinny

        Hi @Nando75
        If it was less than 200mm, yes. 200mm is at your own risk, and make sure your SW team knows how to reach out and request slower MIPI CLK speeds in the event of signal integrity failures (camera failures).
        Keep us posted.
        Thanks!

        N Offline
        N Offline
        Nando75
        wrote on last edited by
        #14

        @Vinny , and what about using this kind of flex cable https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/jae-electronics/JF08R0R051040UA/9477713 ?
        It is supposed that it has an impedance of 100 ohms between pairs

        Thanks in advance,
        Fernando

        VinnyV 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Nando75

          @Vinny , and what about using this kind of flex cable https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/jae-electronics/JF08R0R051040UA/9477713 ?
          It is supposed that it has an impedance of 100 ohms between pairs

          Thanks in advance,
          Fernando

          VinnyV Offline
          VinnyV Offline
          Vinny
          ModalAI Team
          wrote on last edited by
          #15

          Hi @Nando75
          A shielded, impedance-controlled flex was our go-to solution in the early days, and we still offer a few legacy adapters that use it. These provide excellent signal integrity and EMI shielding. However, they’re limited in deployment flexibility; each flex must be meticulously designed for a specific routing path.

          Coax, on the other hand, greatly improves routing versatility and can be deployed across many platforms. The trade-off is reduced signal distance and slightly degraded signal integrity compared to a tuned flex.

          Ultimately, it’s a system-level tradeoff. We’ve transitioned to coax as our mainstream solution in recent years, driven by customer demand for easier installation without the constraints of custom flex circuits.

          Only your team can decide what's more important and hopefully we can enable you either way.

          N 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • VinnyV Vinny

            Hi @Nando75
            A shielded, impedance-controlled flex was our go-to solution in the early days, and we still offer a few legacy adapters that use it. These provide excellent signal integrity and EMI shielding. However, they’re limited in deployment flexibility; each flex must be meticulously designed for a specific routing path.

            Coax, on the other hand, greatly improves routing versatility and can be deployed across many platforms. The trade-off is reduced signal distance and slightly degraded signal integrity compared to a tuned flex.

            Ultimately, it’s a system-level tradeoff. We’ve transitioned to coax as our mainstream solution in recent years, driven by customer demand for easier installation without the constraints of custom flex circuits.

            Only your team can decide what's more important and hopefully we can enable you either way.

            N Offline
            N Offline
            Nando75
            wrote on last edited by
            #16

            @Vinny,

            We are moving forward with JAE Electronics flex cables.

            Regarding the pinout for the Camera Connectors, I have a question about the MIPI Lanes. We intend to connect the IR and Visible MIPI lanes from the HADRON 640 to the VOXL2. Additionally, we will connect the I2C lines to control the camera.

            My primary question is: Can I utilize only one camera group, or will two camera groups be necessary? If a single camera group is feasible, I plan to use one 51-pin Flexible Cable (https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/jae-electronics/JF08R0R051040UA/9477713) to connect our breakout board to an adapter PCB for the Hirose connector.

            This information is crucial for us to begin the schematic design.

            Regards,

            Fernando

            VinnyV 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Nando75

              @Vinny,

              We are moving forward with JAE Electronics flex cables.

              Regarding the pinout for the Camera Connectors, I have a question about the MIPI Lanes. We intend to connect the IR and Visible MIPI lanes from the HADRON 640 to the VOXL2. Additionally, we will connect the I2C lines to control the camera.

              My primary question is: Can I utilize only one camera group, or will two camera groups be necessary? If a single camera group is feasible, I plan to use one 51-pin Flexible Cable (https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/jae-electronics/JF08R0R051040UA/9477713) to connect our breakout board to an adapter PCB for the Hirose connector.

              This information is crucial for us to begin the schematic design.

              Regards,

              Fernando

              VinnyV Offline
              VinnyV Offline
              Vinny
              ModalAI Team
              wrote on last edited by
              #17

              Hi @Nando75
              For the Boson portion of the Hadron, you need a 2L MIPI CSI config and for the EO portion you need a full 4-L MIPI CSI port, so you will be consuming an entire "Camera Group" from VOXL 2 for this.
              You will want to assign the "lower" group to the Boson Portion in 2L mode and the full 4L "upper" group to the EO portion such that our SW matches up easily. Here are some mapping tables we constructed early on for this you can use as a guide (color based mapping, so hopefully that comes through OK).

              33dc9a5e-4635-42f3-92d0-9525d0ea5cad-image.png
              353ad6c9-d17e-494c-b40a-07b5754b489c-image.png

              However, please double check this and also let us know when you are ready for a SCH review. Tag me again on the Forum when you are ready, then I can email you at the address used for your Forum registration so you can share your SCH with me for a review.

              Hope this helped!
              Thanks!

              N S 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • VinnyV Vinny

                Hi @Nando75
                For the Boson portion of the Hadron, you need a 2L MIPI CSI config and for the EO portion you need a full 4-L MIPI CSI port, so you will be consuming an entire "Camera Group" from VOXL 2 for this.
                You will want to assign the "lower" group to the Boson Portion in 2L mode and the full 4L "upper" group to the EO portion such that our SW matches up easily. Here are some mapping tables we constructed early on for this you can use as a guide (color based mapping, so hopefully that comes through OK).

                33dc9a5e-4635-42f3-92d0-9525d0ea5cad-image.png
                353ad6c9-d17e-494c-b40a-07b5754b489c-image.png

                However, please double check this and also let us know when you are ready for a SCH review. Tag me again on the Forum when you are ready, then I can email you at the address used for your Forum registration so you can share your SCH with me for a review.

                Hope this helped!
                Thanks!

                N Offline
                N Offline
                Nando75
                wrote on last edited by
                #18

                @Vinny , I have the schematics ready for review. I will wait for your email to share them with you.

                Regards and thanks in advance,
                Fernando

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • VinnyV Vinny

                  Hi @Nando75
                  For the Boson portion of the Hadron, you need a 2L MIPI CSI config and for the EO portion you need a full 4-L MIPI CSI port, so you will be consuming an entire "Camera Group" from VOXL 2 for this.
                  You will want to assign the "lower" group to the Boson Portion in 2L mode and the full 4L "upper" group to the EO portion such that our SW matches up easily. Here are some mapping tables we constructed early on for this you can use as a guide (color based mapping, so hopefully that comes through OK).

                  33dc9a5e-4635-42f3-92d0-9525d0ea5cad-image.png
                  353ad6c9-d17e-494c-b40a-07b5754b489c-image.png

                  However, please double check this and also let us know when you are ready for a SCH review. Tag me again on the Forum when you are ready, then I can email you at the address used for your Forum registration so you can share your SCH with me for a review.

                  Hope this helped!
                  Thanks!

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  SDSU_Drones
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #19

                  @Vinny I'm also creating my own adapter board to replaces M0181 adapter that connects the Hadron 640 to a 400mm 51-pin Flexible Cable and then connects to the VOXL2 J7 connector. Can I also send you my schematic for you to review? Thank you in advance.

                  VinnyV 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S SDSU_Drones

                    @Vinny I'm also creating my own adapter board to replaces M0181 adapter that connects the Hadron 640 to a 400mm 51-pin Flexible Cable and then connects to the VOXL2 J7 connector. Can I also send you my schematic for you to review? Thank you in advance.

                    VinnyV Offline
                    VinnyV Offline
                    Vinny
                    ModalAI Team
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #20

                    Hi @SDSU_Drones
                    You bet.... emailing you now!
                    Thanks!
                    Vinny

                    VinnyV 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • VinnyV Vinny

                      Hi @SDSU_Drones
                      You bet.... emailing you now!
                      Thanks!
                      Vinny

                      VinnyV Offline
                      VinnyV Offline
                      Vinny
                      ModalAI Team
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #21

                      @SDSU_Drones
                      Just to close this out, I emailed you a review report. Hope that helps you along your way.

                      Thanks!
                      Vinny

                      Dan JenningsD 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • VinnyV Vinny

                        @SDSU_Drones
                        Just to close this out, I emailed you a review report. Hope that helps you along your way.

                        Thanks!
                        Vinny

                        Dan JenningsD Offline
                        Dan JenningsD Offline
                        Dan Jennings
                        Contributor
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #22

                        @Vinny Is J8 still not supported? I'm looking at using a hadron and two M0166 sensors, which may not be possible without J8.

                        Alex KushleyevA 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Dan JenningsD Dan Jennings

                          @Vinny Is J8 still not supported? I'm looking at using a hadron and two M0166 sensors, which may not be possible without J8.

                          Alex KushleyevA Offline
                          Alex KushleyevA Offline
                          Alex Kushleyev
                          ModalAI Team
                          wrote on last edited by Alex Kushleyev
                          #23

                          @Dan-Jennings , M0181 can be used to enable a Boson and another hires or tracking camera (or Hadron combo), see diagram below. You would need to use the kernal variant 1.0.1 (same one used for M0173, which I am assuming you are already using).

                          So basically, you can use any standard config C26-C29 + two more cameras connected to VOXL2 J8. Please note that VOXL2 J8 shares CCI (i2c) buses with J6 and J7, so you have to be a little careful about what cameras you connect to J8 to avoid i2c address conflicts. I am going to put together some more information on that soon. But if you are adding a Hadron or Boson + IMX412 to J8, there will be no conflict.

                          Please let us know if you have any other questions.

                          Alex

                          voxl2_m0181_boson_hires.png

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0

                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                          Register Login
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          ModalAI
                          Categories Recent Tags ModalAI.com Docs
                          © 2026 ModalAI® · Accelerating autonomy for smaller, smarter, safer drones · Powered by NodeBB
                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups