IP Routing, allowing device from usb0 to communicate with device on eth0
-
Good afternoon,
For the past few days, I have been running around in circles trying to make it so my computer with a microhard can ping a device connected to the voxl2 via Ethernet.
Essentially, I have a camera connected to the VOXL2 via Ethernet and the microhard is on usb0. This camera hosts it's own rtsp stream, and does not need to be streamed from the voxl2. From my host computer, I want to be able to connect to the camera connected to the voxl2 and directly ping it's IP. I know to do this, I need to have the VOXL2 route from usb0 to eth0 in some way to make it so when the GCS pings the camera's ip, it goes through the usb0 interface to eth0.
I am pretty new overall to networking, so please correct me if my idea is wrong.
bond0: flags=5123<UP,BROADCAST,MASTER,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 ether 0e:ae:7a:d3:cb:54 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 dummy0: flags=195<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,NOARP> mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::aee5:90ba:7fd5:a0ed prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> ether f2:fa:36:1f:17:83 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 49 bytes 15670 (15.6 KB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.144.21 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.144.255 ether 5c:85:7e:3e:94:33 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 2577 bytes 154620 (154.6 KB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 83 bytes 21341 (21.3 KB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host> loop txqueuelen 1000 (Local Loopback) RX packets 95 bytes 8224 (8.2 KB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 95 bytes 8224 (8.2 KB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 usb0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.168.100 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.168.255 inet6 fe80::3b33:ef4a:4410:1470 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> ether 96:dc:72:9d:a5:01 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 5661 bytes 324594 (324.5 KB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 3874 bytes 456769 (456.7 KB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0The first thing I did was enable forwarding on the VOXL2 by uncommenting this line on /etc/sysctl.conf
net.ipv4.ip_forward=1Then I tried pinging the device from my home computer while connected via microhard.
From my home computer:
I was able to ping 192.168.168.100, which is expected since that is the microhard.
I was able to ping 192.168.144.21 which is the eth0 interface.
However, I have been unable to ping 192.168.144.52, which is the address of the camera, despite being able to ping it successfully on the VOXL2.john@john-desktop:~$ ping -R 192.168.168.100 PING 192.168.168.100 (192.168.168.100) 56(124) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.168.100: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=3.06 ms RR: 192.168.168.146 192.168.168.100 192.168.168.100 192.168.168.146 64 bytes from 192.168.168.100: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=3.59 ms (same route) 64 bytes from 192.168.168.100: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.68 ms (same route) 64 bytes from 192.168.168.100: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=3.31 ms (same route) ^C --- 192.168.168.100 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3004ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.680/3.159/3.585/0.332 ms john@john-desktop:~$ ping -R 192.168.144.21 PING 192.168.144.21 (192.168.144.21) 56(124) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.144.21: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=3.14 ms RR: 192.168.168.150 192.168.144.21 192.168.144.21 192.168.168.150 64 bytes from 192.168.144.21: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=2.81 ms (same route) 64 bytes from 192.168.144.21: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.99 ms (same route) 64 bytes from 192.168.144.21: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=2.84 ms (same route) 64 bytes from 192.168.144.21: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=2.85 ms (same route) 64 bytes from 192.168.144.21: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=2.77 ms (same route) ^C --- 192.168.144.21 ping statistics --- 6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 5009ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.771/2.900/3.137/0.126 msI've tried changing the routing table to allow for connections over usb0 that point to 192.168.144.52 to go over eth0, but I haven't had luck. I am unsure if there is something I'm doing wrong here.
Here is my routing table:
voxl2:/etc/modalai$ ip route default via 192.168.168.1 dev usb0 src 192.168.168.106 metric 209 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.208.31 metric 208 192.168.144.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel src 192.168.144.21 metric 202 192.168.168.0/24 dev usb0 scope link src 192.168.168.100I've also tried this routing table to enforce that we should be routing pings to 192.168.144.52 to eth0 :
default via 192.168.168.1 dev usb0 src 192.168.168.106 metric 209 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.208.31 metric 208 192.168.144.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.144.21 192.168.144.52 dev eth0 scope link src 192.168.168.100 192.168.168.0/24 dev usb0 scope link src 192.168.168.100The outcome is the same when changing the routing table. However, I know that changing the routing table is doing SOMETHING because if I remove all eth0 entries, I cannot ping any eth0 device.
Am I thinking of this wrong? Is there anything I should try? Does the VOXL2 handle routing differently, or is there anything custom going on?
-
Good afternoon,
For the past few days, I have been running around in circles trying to make it so my computer with a microhard can ping a device connected to the voxl2 via Ethernet.
Essentially, I have a camera connected to the VOXL2 via Ethernet and the microhard is on usb0. This camera hosts it's own rtsp stream, and does not need to be streamed from the voxl2. From my host computer, I want to be able to connect to the camera connected to the voxl2 and directly ping it's IP. I know to do this, I need to have the VOXL2 route from usb0 to eth0 in some way to make it so when the GCS pings the camera's ip, it goes through the usb0 interface to eth0.
I am pretty new overall to networking, so please correct me if my idea is wrong.
bond0: flags=5123<UP,BROADCAST,MASTER,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 ether 0e:ae:7a:d3:cb:54 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 dummy0: flags=195<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,NOARP> mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::aee5:90ba:7fd5:a0ed prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> ether f2:fa:36:1f:17:83 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 49 bytes 15670 (15.6 KB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.144.21 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.144.255 ether 5c:85:7e:3e:94:33 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 2577 bytes 154620 (154.6 KB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 83 bytes 21341 (21.3 KB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host> loop txqueuelen 1000 (Local Loopback) RX packets 95 bytes 8224 (8.2 KB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 95 bytes 8224 (8.2 KB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 usb0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.168.100 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.168.255 inet6 fe80::3b33:ef4a:4410:1470 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> ether 96:dc:72:9d:a5:01 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 5661 bytes 324594 (324.5 KB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 3874 bytes 456769 (456.7 KB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0The first thing I did was enable forwarding on the VOXL2 by uncommenting this line on /etc/sysctl.conf
net.ipv4.ip_forward=1Then I tried pinging the device from my home computer while connected via microhard.
From my home computer:
I was able to ping 192.168.168.100, which is expected since that is the microhard.
I was able to ping 192.168.144.21 which is the eth0 interface.
However, I have been unable to ping 192.168.144.52, which is the address of the camera, despite being able to ping it successfully on the VOXL2.john@john-desktop:~$ ping -R 192.168.168.100 PING 192.168.168.100 (192.168.168.100) 56(124) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.168.100: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=3.06 ms RR: 192.168.168.146 192.168.168.100 192.168.168.100 192.168.168.146 64 bytes from 192.168.168.100: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=3.59 ms (same route) 64 bytes from 192.168.168.100: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.68 ms (same route) 64 bytes from 192.168.168.100: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=3.31 ms (same route) ^C --- 192.168.168.100 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3004ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.680/3.159/3.585/0.332 ms john@john-desktop:~$ ping -R 192.168.144.21 PING 192.168.144.21 (192.168.144.21) 56(124) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.144.21: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=3.14 ms RR: 192.168.168.150 192.168.144.21 192.168.144.21 192.168.168.150 64 bytes from 192.168.144.21: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=2.81 ms (same route) 64 bytes from 192.168.144.21: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.99 ms (same route) 64 bytes from 192.168.144.21: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=2.84 ms (same route) 64 bytes from 192.168.144.21: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=2.85 ms (same route) 64 bytes from 192.168.144.21: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=2.77 ms (same route) ^C --- 192.168.144.21 ping statistics --- 6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 5009ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.771/2.900/3.137/0.126 msI've tried changing the routing table to allow for connections over usb0 that point to 192.168.144.52 to go over eth0, but I haven't had luck. I am unsure if there is something I'm doing wrong here.
Here is my routing table:
voxl2:/etc/modalai$ ip route default via 192.168.168.1 dev usb0 src 192.168.168.106 metric 209 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.208.31 metric 208 192.168.144.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel src 192.168.144.21 metric 202 192.168.168.0/24 dev usb0 scope link src 192.168.168.100I've also tried this routing table to enforce that we should be routing pings to 192.168.144.52 to eth0 :
default via 192.168.168.1 dev usb0 src 192.168.168.106 metric 209 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.208.31 metric 208 192.168.144.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.144.21 192.168.144.52 dev eth0 scope link src 192.168.168.100 192.168.168.0/24 dev usb0 scope link src 192.168.168.100The outcome is the same when changing the routing table. However, I know that changing the routing table is doing SOMETHING because if I remove all eth0 entries, I cannot ping any eth0 device.
Am I thinking of this wrong? Is there anything I should try? Does the VOXL2 handle routing differently, or is there anything custom going on?
@John-Nomikos No, VOXL 2 is pretty vanilla Debian Linux. Routing should work the same as any other. Maybe you could use gstreamer to setup an RTSP server that takes in the IP Camera data?
-
@John-Nomikos No, VOXL 2 is pretty vanilla Debian Linux. Routing should work the same as any other. Maybe you could use gstreamer to setup an RTSP server that takes in the IP Camera data?
@Moderator Yep, I got routing through the VOXL2 working. The problem was actually in my host and the device I was pinging. I would have to setup static routing on both devices. But I ended up using a NAT on the VOXL2
Thank you for the help!
-
@Moderator Yep, I got routing through the VOXL2 working. The problem was actually in my host and the device I was pinging. I would have to setup static routing on both devices. But I ended up using a NAT on the VOXL2
Thank you for the help!
@John-Nomikos Hi, Can you please explain how you solved this? I am facing same problem where my camera is connected via USB to ethenret convertor with Microhard add-on board and my host machine is unable to ping my camera but can ping voxl2.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login