Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Collapse
Brand Logo

ModalAI Forum

  1. ModalAI Support Forum
  2. Software Development
  3. VOXL SDK
  4. Custom YOLO model on VOXL1

Custom YOLO model on VOXL1

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved VOXL SDK
6 Posts 2 Posters 2.1k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    michi
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I fine-tuned a YOLOv8 model and converted it to tflite according to the script and specifications in the ModalAI documentation (quantizing, 16-bit, etc), and made sure I used tensorflow 2.2.3 which converting it (since it says VOXL1 has to have that version for the model). I then scp'd it over to my VOXL along with the labels file and changed the names to replace the old yolo model (don't worry, I renamed the old stuff to old_<name> so its still on there.) Now the tflite server won't pop up in the voxl-portal and the program ends up stuck and not responding when I execute the tflite server even in debug mode. Below is the Netron analysis of the model aboard originally was:
    Screenshot from 2024-02-21 10-04-24.png

    The analysis of mine is:
    Screenshot from 2024-02-21 10-04-18.png

    I see that the I/O sizes are different. It also appears that the axes are flipped in the output layer. My questions are: 1) can I use YOLOv8 or should I use v5 and 2) should I be exporting the model with 320,320 instead of 640,640, or are variable sizes okay?

    I also saw a result on another forum post that was solved that said there was a seg fault anytime there are not 80 classes exactly on a YOLO model, which could be the issue, but I wanted to make sure these other items weren't of concern either.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      michi
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I also tried using a YOLOv5 model with the same conversion process and kept all 80 classes to rule out that being the error. To my surprise it appeared in the voxl-portal but only after a long delay and with 2 FPS and super long inference times. Would this be a product of the model being too big?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        michi
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I have now installed voxl-tflite-server_0.3.2_202401161223.ipk to upgrade the tflite server to the night that the 80 class restriction was fixed (I assuming this is the correct one to install since on the forum it said on Jan 16 that it would be fixed in the nightly SDK release.) When I ran the YOLOv8 model trained on 10 classes (making sure the labels file was correct as well) before doing this, it just never started up or showed anything when running tflite-server, but now when running that same model, I get these results:

        Screenshot from 2024-02-22 12-30-08.png
        Screenshot from 2024-02-22 12-24-57.png

        ? 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M michi

          I have now installed voxl-tflite-server_0.3.2_202401161223.ipk to upgrade the tflite server to the night that the 80 class restriction was fixed (I assuming this is the correct one to install since on the forum it said on Jan 16 that it would be fixed in the nightly SDK release.) When I ran the YOLOv8 model trained on 10 classes (making sure the labels file was correct as well) before doing this, it just never started up or showed anything when running tflite-server, but now when running that same model, I get these results:

          Screenshot from 2024-02-22 12-30-08.png
          Screenshot from 2024-02-22 12-24-57.png

          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          A Former User
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @michi

          Hey, happy to try and help you with this as I'm the maintainer of voxl-tflite-server. In general we seldom test things on VOXL 1 so I'm not super educated on the problem you might be facing. You mentioned poor performance with low framerates and long inference times, this could definitely be the product of using the older chipset.

          Do you mind testing some of the models that are already onboard? I would be curious to know how they compare to these numbers.

          Thanks!
          Thomas Patton

          M 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • ? A Former User

            @michi

            Hey, happy to try and help you with this as I'm the maintainer of voxl-tflite-server. In general we seldom test things on VOXL 1 so I'm not super educated on the problem you might be facing. You mentioned poor performance with low framerates and long inference times, this could definitely be the product of using the older chipset.

            Do you mind testing some of the models that are already onboard? I would be curious to know how they compare to these numbers.

            Thanks!
            Thomas Patton

            M Offline
            M Offline
            michi
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @thomas hey there Thomas, thank you for your reply!

            Understandable that it's harder because of VOXL 1 rather than 2. I've tested all the other models on board and they produce very similar results as described by the Deep Learning documentation guide. The YOLOv5 model already on board gives about 20 FPS and 40-50ms inferences with the hires small color camera (similar with other pre-loaded models both on hires and tracking cameras). So, it seems like the VOXL 1 is running YOLO at a good speed, just not the one I uploaded. However, it seems the one I uploaded is much bigger (180MB) as compared to the one that came on it (14MB). I used the float 16 quantization as described in the documentation, but should I try using a smaller model like YOLOv5s versus YOLOv5x?

            ? 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M michi

              @thomas hey there Thomas, thank you for your reply!

              Understandable that it's harder because of VOXL 1 rather than 2. I've tested all the other models on board and they produce very similar results as described by the Deep Learning documentation guide. The YOLOv5 model already on board gives about 20 FPS and 40-50ms inferences with the hires small color camera (similar with other pre-loaded models both on hires and tracking cameras). So, it seems like the VOXL 1 is running YOLO at a good speed, just not the one I uploaded. However, it seems the one I uploaded is much bigger (180MB) as compared to the one that came on it (14MB). I used the float 16 quantization as described in the documentation, but should I try using a smaller model like YOLOv5s versus YOLOv5x?

              ? Offline
              ? Offline
              A Former User
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @michi

              Yeah, I'd be curious to know what your results are like using a custom YOLOv5 model. If things are still slow, the issue might be in your quantization process. However if it speeds up, it may just be that the model architecture is too big.

              I have it on my to-do list at some point in the next few weeks to add YOLOv8 to our list of default models so when/if I do that I'll keep you posted with the results of that as well.

              Keep me posted on how I can be of assistance!

              Thomas Patton

              1 Reply Last reply
              0

              Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

              Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

              With your input, this post could be even better 💗

              Register Login
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              ModalAI
              Categories Recent Tags ModalAI.com Docs
              © 2026 ModalAI® · Accelerating autonomy for smaller, smarter, safer drones · Powered by NodeBB
              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • Users
              • Groups