ModalAI Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    M0181 Pin Out and Electrical Diagram

    Support Request Format for Best Results
    flir
    3
    15
    163
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      joseph.vale @Vinny
      last edited by

      Hi @Vinny

      My apologies on the miscomms - I meant the connection the VOXL2 mating element. I've seen that pinout and thanks for resharing - but I wanted to also double check on the impedance matching and whatnot. Our IPEX cable has an impedance of 100ohms - is this consistent with your design? Do you do cross wiring / ESD protection? I'm not seeing these in the docs. Effectively are there any other design aspects we should be aware of making that board connection? We have all of the Hadron stuff we need for their pinouts and whatnot.

      VinnyV 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • VinnyV
        Vinny ModalAI Team @joseph.vale
        last edited by

        Hi @joseph-vale
        Great, thanks for clarifying.
        Apologies our website is not always perfect. It is maintained by us Engineers, so we often take some info for granted. I am a few years delinquent in adding image sensor design guidance to our tech docs 🙂
        All our MIPI_CSI lines are indeed 100-Ohm Differential, so the IPEX mate will match.
        We include ESD protection on all MIPI CSI and I2C and GPIO/MCLK signals at the VOXL 2 J6, J7, and J8 connectors, so no need to double protect (or you can impact the bus signal quality with the added capacitance).

        When you get to the point of generating a schematic, I will offer a courtesy review. Ping me on this thread again and then I can email you privately to share if you wish.

        One thing we did on our Coax design was plan on always using the same 26-pin cable, so it is our adapters that vary in pinouts, but our cable is always the fully populate 26 conductor DF56 series.
        For Boson/Hadron, we use multiple conductors of 5V. We set that based on the DCR spec of our coax cable, so with your IPIEX cables, you can do something similar to achieve success.
        We were also advised by Hirose to NOT use the outer shield as current carrying, so for every +DC path, we have a return GND conductor.

        Keep us posted!

        J N 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          joseph.vale @Vinny
          last edited by

          @Vinny hey man y'all have incredible support and responsiveness and honestly I'll take your docs over most anything I've dealt with on other projects. I'm an electrical / optical engineer myself so I feel that haha. I appreciate it and will follow up when ready!

          VinnyV 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • VinnyV
            Vinny ModalAI Team @joseph.vale
            last edited by

            Thanks @joseph-vale for the kind words.
            We will continue to try our best 🙂
            Our success only comes with your success.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • N
              Nando75 @Vinny
              last edited by

              Hello @Vinny , I am Fernando, and I am working on this project.

              There was an error regarding the Impedance of the I-PEX cable. Each Micro-Coaxial has an impedance of 50 ohms, and for sure, the cable you are using is also 50 ohms.

              My question is, how are you connecting each 100-ohm differential pair from the MIPI interface through each coaxial line?

              Regards and thanks in advance

              VinnyV 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • VinnyV
                Vinny ModalAI Team @Nando75
                last edited by

                Hi @Nando75
                Yes, that is a fundamental limit of ALL uCoax that is not Twinax Impedance controlled conductors. Therefor all IPEX, Hirose, Molex, TE, etc (you name it) coax will fundamentally be limited in performance compared to true 100-ohm differential controlled impedance you can get from flex circuits or Samtec's Twinax. It is one of the many tradeoffs in our design space we need to make. As such, that is why we are firm on keeping the coax short and we do not sell any option longer than 180mm since at some point that small impedance offset and tolerances between two 50-ohm conductors compared to a true coupled 100-ohm may play a role.

                Hope this helps you.
                Thanks!

                N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • N
                  Nando75 @Vinny
                  last edited by

                  Thanks, @Vinny, for your help.

                  Just to confirm, you're suggesting that an IPEX cable assembly like this one (https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/i-pex/81457-100B-02-D/22108838?gclsrc=aw.ds&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=203759898&gbraid=0AAAAADrbLljG_0DgosYmSjn-L6wfiInDx&gclid=CjwKCAjwxrLHBhA2EiwAu9EdMyI0xVm4X54JIAOikP3zqiHT_KgnCN1m9s6Gd_ba0VRVhewe2lowKxoCYHAQAvD_BwE), with a length of 200mm (slightly longer than your suggested 180mm), could work if each line of the differential pair is carried over a separate coaxial cable.

                  Regards,

                  Fernando

                  VinnyV 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • VinnyV
                    Vinny ModalAI Team @Nando75
                    last edited by

                    Hi @Nando75
                    If it was less than 200mm, yes. 200mm is at your own risk, and make sure your SW team knows how to reach out and request slower MIPI CLK speeds in the event of signal integrity failures (camera failures).
                    Keep us posted.
                    Thanks!

                    N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • N
                      Nando75 @Vinny
                      last edited by

                      @Vinny , and what about using this kind of flex cable https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/jae-electronics/JF08R0R051040UA/9477713 ?
                      It is supposed that it has an impedance of 100 ohms between pairs

                      Thanks in advance,
                      Fernando

                      VinnyV 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • VinnyV
                        Vinny ModalAI Team @Nando75
                        last edited by

                        Hi @Nando75
                        A shielded, impedance-controlled flex was our go-to solution in the early days, and we still offer a few legacy adapters that use it. These provide excellent signal integrity and EMI shielding. However, they’re limited in deployment flexibility; each flex must be meticulously designed for a specific routing path.

                        Coax, on the other hand, greatly improves routing versatility and can be deployed across many platforms. The trade-off is reduced signal distance and slightly degraded signal integrity compared to a tuned flex.

                        Ultimately, it’s a system-level tradeoff. We’ve transitioned to coax as our mainstream solution in recent years, driven by customer demand for easier installation without the constraints of custom flex circuits.

                        Only your team can decide what's more important and hopefully we can enable you either way.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Powered by NodeBB | Contributors