@Alex-Kushleyev Yup, editing kona-perf_defconfig
looks to have worked, thanks!
Latest posts made by jcai
-
RE: VOXL2 kernel version
-
RE: VOXL2 kernel version
@Alex-Kushleyev I think this is just an issue with Windows drivers. I ended up switching over to OSX to use adb and fastboot, no issues there. I'm just using a USB drive to get the
.img
file from the VM to the Mac. Boot tests look good.One more thing, I'm looking at the kernel build guide and there's a section that says I can enable in tree drivers by editing:
apps_proc/poky/meta-voxl2-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux-msm/files/m005x.cfg
I don't have this file in my system. the closest I found is
../linux-msm/files/configs/m0054
. In this directory, there'skona_defconfig
andkona-perf_defconfig
. What's the difference between these two files? Are these the correct files to be editing to enable, for example,CONFIG_MACVLAN
? -
RE: VOXL2 kernel version
@Alex-Kushleyev I've managed to get the build working, thanks! I think the problems started because my initial docker image was built with sudo. Removing the workspace folder and starting from scratch got everything set up as user.
I'm now attempting to test the build using:
adb reboot bootloader fastboot boot your_new_kernel.img
Are there specific drivers I need to download? Once I put the voxl into bootloader, VirtualBox can't detect the device anymore. The same is true on my Windows host. As a result, running
fastboot boot new_kernel.img
gives me a constant<waiting for any device>
message. As reference, here's my device manager during normal and bootloader modes. The "Android" device also comes and goes. It usually exists for a couple seconds before disappearing.
-
RE: VOXL2 kernel version
On the host:
jcai@jcai-VirtualBox:~/qrb5165-kernel-build-docker/workspace/lu.um.1.2.1/apps_proc$ ls -lah total 48K drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 4.0K Oct 9 15:42 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4.0K Oct 8 13:03 .. drwxrwxr-x 2 1001 1001 20K Aug 23 2022 deb_premirror_packages drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4.0K Oct 8 17:27 disregard drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K Oct 9 09:49 downloads drwxr-xr-x 34 root root 4.0K Oct 9 15:25 poky drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4.0K Oct 9 15:23 .repo lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Oct 8 17:33 setup-environment -> poky/qti-conf/set_bb_env.sh drwxr-xr-x 25 root root 4.0K Oct 8 17:31 src
In Docker:
user@8de0065c2813:~/build_mount/lu.um.1.2.1/apps_proc$ ls -lah total 48K drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 4.0K Oct 9 19:42 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4.0K Oct 8 17:03 .. drwxrwxr-x 2 1001 1001 20K Aug 23 2022 deb_premirror_packages drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4.0K Oct 8 21:27 disregard drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K Oct 9 13:49 downloads drwxr-xr-x 34 root root 4.0K Oct 9 19:25 poky drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4.0K Oct 9 19:23 .repo lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Oct 8 21:33 setup-environment -> poky/qti-conf/set_bb_env.sh drwxr-xr-x 25 root root 4.0K Oct 8 21:31 src
Yeah, ownership looks like an issue here
-
RE: VOXL2 kernel version
@Alex-Kushleyev I was only able to follow the guide exactly until I got into the container. From there , all the scripts inside were run with sudo. Otherwise, I would get permission issues like below.
-
RE: VOXL2 kernel version
@Alex-Kushleyev I'm having some issues with building the kernel. I'm running the latest Ubuntu in VirtualBox (on Windows) for this. In the container, the sync and patch scripts run without issue but when building as root, I get the following error:
If I run build without sudo, I get access permission issues:
-
RE: VOXL2 kernel version
@Zachary-Lowell-0 I'm on Docker 24.0.2
So I was reading through the kernel build guide, and I saw an example that enabled
smsc95xx
by modifying them005x.cfg
file (CONFIG_USB_NET_SMSC95XX=y
).From what I can tell by reading through the IPVLAN docs, it's much the same steps to enable it (
CONFIG_IPVLAN=y
orCONFIG_IPVLAN=m
). So it looks like it should be safe? Is this still something you would advise against? Also, would there be any issues with running all of the build stuff on MacOS? -
VOXL2 kernel version
Hello,
I'm trying to set up a Docker network with an ipvlan driver. The network starts without issue, but when creating the container, I'm getting the following error:
Error response from daemon: failed to create the ipvlan port: operation not supported
Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find much about this error, so currently the only lead I have has to do with the Linux kernel version. The Docker docs says:
Kernel requirements: IPvlan Linux kernel v4.2+ (support for earlier kernels exists but is buggy). To check your current kernel version, use uname -r
I see that my current version is 4.19.125. Is there a way to upgrade? I'm fairly new to Linux so reading through the VOXL2 Kernel Build Guide hasn't been very helpful to me.
Thanks!
Update: running
voxl2:/$ ip link add link eth0 name ipvlan-test type ipvlan RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported
It looks like I might be missing a module? Not sure there
-
RE: VOXL2 stream video through /dev/video0
@Eric-Katzfey There might be something about networking that I'm not understanding here.
voxl-streamer by default streams RTSP to <IP>:8900, so for me I can see the stream by going to rtsp://192.168.1.222:8900/live
Just changing the port to 9976 doesn't equate to udp @ 127.0.0.1:9976, does it?