ModalAI Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. PSI
    3. Topics
    P
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 3
    • Posts 8
    • Best 1
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Topics created by PSI

    • P

      Listing/Changing Camera Resolution

      VOXL 2
      • • • PSI
      2
      0
      Votes
      2
      Posts
      239
      Views

      P

      After some digging, I came across the qtiqmmfsrc GStreamer element. If I use this to get the video stream at 4000x3000 (video/x-raw, format=NV12), I get the same distortion shown above. However, if I request the H.264 stream (video/x-h264, format=NV12), I get a clear picture.

      Below are the pipelines that I tested using the IMX412.

      # Distorted Output gst-launch-1.0 -e qtiqmmfsrc name=qmmf ! video/x-raw,format=NV12,width=4000,height=3000,framerate=30/1 ! \ omxh264enc control-rate=2 target-bitrate=6000000 ! h264parse ! \ matroskamux ! filesink location=43_raw.mkv # Good Output gst-launch-1.0 -e qtiqmmfsrc name=qmmf ! video/x-h264,format=NV12,width=4000,height=3000,framerate=30/1 ! \ h264parse ! \ matroskamux ! filesink location=43_h264.mkv

      On a side note, the video's white balance from qtiqmmfsrc is better than when requesting images through voxl-camera-server. The video is extremely warm when delivered through voxl-camera-server, though I admit that I never looked into the configuration for this.

      In any case, it looks like this is maybe an issue with Qualcomm's libs. I haven't yet looked further into the voxl-camera-server source, though I don't suppose there's been an update to the qmmfsrc or related libs that can be updated on the VOXL2, is there?

    • P

      VOXL 2 IMX377/IMX412 support and configuration

      VOXL 2
      • • • PSI
      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      386
      Views

      modaltbM

      We normally do a 'proper' voxl-camera-server update to add meta data (e.g. this commit) but I've used the imx214 with updated preview_width etc for a different sensor and it seemed to run OK for me for testing.

      Let me see about IMX377, seems like if we sell it we SHOULD support it already!!! But need to see what's up.

    • P

      External Storage

      VOXL 2
      • • • PSI
      5
      0
      Votes
      5
      Posts
      495
      Views

      P

      @Vinny Sounds good, I'll look at the expansion board for J3. In the past, I've had issues maintaining 40MB/s write speeds over USB2, not sure if it was hardware or software, but thus my jump to USB3.

      Thanks for the info about the Mythic, I'll reach out regarding that.