ModalAI Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. aashry
    3. Best
    A
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 8
    • Posts 27
    • Best 3
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Best posts made by aashry

    • RE: Limit cameras problem

      @SHofmeester I think you can choose the default configuration for your hardware from voxl-configure-cameras , and then you can turn off the cameras you don't want to use by modifying the config file directly at etc/modalai/voxl-camera-server.conf , and change the flags for the cameras you don't want to use to be false instead of true.

      posted in Ask your questions right here!
      A
      aashry
    • Clarification on voxl and PX4 Integration for state estimation

      Hello!

      I have some question regarding the onboard state estimation running onboard, and specifically for the interface between voxl-vision-px4 and voxl-qvio

      As I understand, the voxl-qvio-server utilizes the Qualcomm algorithm, processing input from the tracking camera and IMU data to output QVIO data. This data is then consumed by voxl-vision-px4. My confusion arises at this stage: does voxl-vision-px4 pass this VIO data as a state estimate directly to PX4, bypassing PX4's internal EKF2 processing? In other words, what exactly is running on the PX4 in this setup?

      I'm aware that the EKF2 algorithm is typically used on PX4 for state estimation by fusing data from various sensors. How does this interact with the VIO data from the qvio server? Is the EKF algorithm on PX4 still active in this configuration, and if so, is it using the processed data from the qvio server to refine the state estimates?

      This leads to another question about the distinction between the outputs of the qvio server and the EKF algorithm on PX4. Are they operating independently, each producing separate state estimates based on common inputs (IMU and tracking camera data), or is there a fusion of data from both for enhanced accuracy in state estimation?

      Finally, I'm trying to pinpoint the source of the pose data when interfacing Mavros with voxl-vision-px4. Specifically mavros/local_position/pose output, which algorithm (qvio or EKF2 on PX4) is providing this state estimate?

      I apologize if my questions seem a bit convoluted; I'm just trying to get a clear understanding of how these systems work together for state estimation. Any insights or clarifications would be greatly appreciated!

      Thanks in advance for your help!

      posted in Ask your questions right here!
      A
      aashry
    • RE: Clarification on voxl and PX4 Integration for state estimation

      @Moderator any insights?

      posted in Ask your questions right here!
      A
      aashry