ModalAI Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. manzur
    M
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 3
    • Posts 16
    • Best 0
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    manzur

    @manzur

    0
    Reputation
    7
    Profile views
    16
    Posts
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined Last Online

    manzur Unfollow Follow

    Latest posts made by manzur

    • RE: Collision Warning sign

      @Chad-Sweet

      Update:

      • I have performed the calibration process as you mentioned for both Stereo camera and tracking camera by following the calibration documentation https://docs.modalai.com/calibrate-cameras/ though they are not moved from their original position of VOXL flight deck.
        2744ae31-4605-48ab-be86-bbdcc97f51cf-image.png

      • While performing the calibration for stereo cameras I have also fixed the focus for both left and right camera. But after the calibration process the collision prevention does not seem to be working any more.

      • By that I mean the the obstacle topic does not seems to detect anything even it is very close or far from the wall. I also tried with different object to see if the camera can pick up the difference but it does not seems to be consistent any more.

      • At 0 degree angle it mostly shows 0 m. It only shows some value while it is in the ground but once flying it is completely 0 m in withing +- 30 deg angle range.

      • After several try I decided to perform the calibration process again, and after the process I found same result. I also tried to change the CP_dist from QGC parameter ranging from 0.5- 10 meter but it does not seems to work anymore.

      • Then i realized I have made a big mistake by not saving the default calibration.stereo.xml file for calibration and then I found the sample calibration file in the voxl-camera-calibration git folder which then I replaced it with the calibrated file.

      • Once this process is complete I then fly the Modal AI m500 and it worked almost as before but the CP_dist value of 1.5 m seems now too much and we reduced it to 0.8 meter.

      • This the sample calibration.xml snippet from the git hub link:
        1362c676-a1ef-4bae-85b4-ee0e6799befa-image.png

      • I also noticed the focal_length_x and y for calibrated camera is ranging from 488-490 for both camera value which is much higher value after the calibration process compared with the sample calibration file shown above.

      Please let us know what can be done to correct this calibration problem or at least how I can obtain the default factory calibration data from modal ai.

      posted in Ask your questions right here!
      M
      manzur
    • RE: Question about different pixhawk with VOXL unit and stereo camera extension cable???

      @Chad-Sweet Thanks for your reply. This is the exact answer I was looking for. The flight core is perfect but here at our company we need to use different Pixhawk board for some specific application.

      posted in VOXL
      M
      manzur
    • RE: Issue in Microhard paring with Slave unit

      @tom I was able to access the web interface by plugging the Add-on Microhard unit into a development board. And indeed I found the Network ID is mismatched and was set to as pMDDL instead of pDDL. Also the frequency was set to 76-2477 which is okay since I tried with multiple band with the slave unit as well. See the default configuration of the Add-on unit before changing

      5a6d73fb-a02b-4a5f-b74b-3f9e1e1619cd-image.png

      posted in Ask your questions right here!
      M
      manzur
    • RE: Question about different pixhawk with VOXL unit and stereo camera extension cable???

      @Chad-Sweet Thanks for you reply, But my important question is No.2 Which is, can I separate the VOXL autonomy board from the flight core, let say by cutting the board from the complete board as shown below:
      or is it possible to turn the flight core unit OFF for adding another Pixhawk

      b80d041c-219c-427d-9e19-8eecb20332d9-image.png .

      Let me know your answer.

      posted in VOXL
      M
      manzur
    • RE: Issue in Microhard paring with Slave unit

      @tom Thanks for your reply. Let me know if you can come up with some solution. In the mean time I am trying to get a development board for the Microhard unit to plugin and see if I can log in to the config-webpage.

      posted in Ask your questions right here!
      M
      manzur
    • RE: Issue in Microhard paring with Slave unit

      @tom This is the image showing LED behaviour.

      ec27339a-bcd3-4a55-85ad-c39c6368b146-image.png

      From the bottom

      1. Lnk/ACT : OFF
      2. Lnk/100 : ON
      3. Lnk : ON
      4. CPU : ON
      5. RSSI_1, RSSI_2, RSSI_3 : blinking one after another
      6. RX : ON (continuous)
      7. TX : Blinking (low)

      Note: One thing I noticed now is that the Standalone microhard unit we have is 128 bit AES encryption model, where the Modal AI add-on module is showing 256 bit AES encryption model. Do you think this is the reason they are not communicating? All the microhard unit we have here is 128 bit AES model. If that is the case how can we access the Add-on Microhard unit?

      posted in Ask your questions right here!
      M
      manzur
    • RE: Issue in Microhard paring with Slave unit

      @tom Microhard module that is in the add-on board from Modal AI as an add on to m500 unit and same is pDDL2450

      2210729b-a92a-4a5f-813e-1445b856509a-image.png

      posted in Ask your questions right here!
      M
      manzur
    • RE: Issue in Microhard paring with Slave unit

      @tom I have not been able to establish connection between these two Microhard modules. But independently the slave standalone unit has been used for another system as well and I know It is working. 0ad561d0-053a-45b7-96ef-fbd93611da3b-image.png
      Standalone unit

      posted in Ask your questions right here!
      M
      manzur
    • Question about different pixhawk with VOXL unit and stereo camera extension cable???

      Hi, we wanted to know few things about the VOXL unit. I will list the questions below:

      • Is it possible to use different Pixhawk (e,g. Cube 2.1 or mRO Control zero) with VOXL autonomy computer? If yes, then what is the connection process and details.
      • FYI, We have a M500 complete VOXL unit with Flight core. Is it possible to separate them and use different Pixhawk instead?
      • Is it possible to increase the Stereo camera cable in each direction by 12-24 inch? I saw that there is 5.7 inch extension cable available in the Modal AI store but it will not be enough for our requirement. Any suggestion is much appreciated on how to increase the length for the stereo camera.
      posted in VOXL
      M
      manzur
    • RE: Issue in Microhard paring with Slave unit

      @tom We are using microhard from Airborne innovations 2400 MHz unit on the other side. And I can access the slave standalone unit perfectly with PC.

      posted in Ask your questions right here!
      M
      manzur