ModalAI Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    mavros

    Software Development
    2
    3
    336
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • V
      vaughanje
      last edited by

      On my VOXL Flight setup, I'm having trouble getting the Docker ROS image to communicate with the VOXL. I'm following the instructions from this link:

      https://docs.modalai.com/mavros/

      I changed the parameters in the /etc/modalai/voxl-vision-px4.conf file to include:

      "en_localhost_mavlink_udp":	true,
      

      I am able to communicate with the Docker image and can publish and subscribe to messages from it. I do see all the mavros topics, from inside the docker container, on the "native" VOXL shell, and from my remote computer connected over WiFi or via our MicroHard radio. However, the /mavros/state message indicates that there is no connection. rostopic echo /mavros/state gives only one message:

      header:
        seq: 0
        stamp:
          secs: 2228
          nsecs: 862914984
        frame_id: ''
      connected: False
      armed: False
      guided: False
      manual_input: False
      mode: ''
      system_status: 0
      ---
      

      The last messages on running ./run_mavros.sh from inside the Docker container are:

      ...
      ...
      [ INFO] [732.234354982]: Known MAVLink dialects: common ardupilotmega ASLUAV autoquad icarous matrixpilot paparazzi slugs standard uAvionix ualberta
      [ INFO] [732.234448888]: MAVROS started. MY ID 1.240, TARGET ID 1.1
      

      I also found this article about the MAVlink SDK and how to setup local communication:

      https://gitlab.com/voxl-public/voxl-docker-images/voxl-docker-mavsdk-python

      Given the version of the VOXL software on the system, it seems that we need this in /etc/modalai/voxl-vision-px4.conf instead of the above option:

      "en_secondary_qgc": true,
      "secondary_qgc_ip": "127.0.0.1",
      

      However, that did not work either. I get the same type message from rostopic echo-ing /mavros/state.

      I am able to plug into the FCU via USB and run mavros, by specifying the correct serial port on launch.

      The output of voxl-version for my current setup is:

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      system-image:    ModalAI 2.2.0 BUILDER: ekatzfey BUILD_TIME: 2020-01-28_23:54
      kernel:          #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Jan 28 23:55:02 UTC 2020 3.18.71-perf
      factory-bundle:  0.0.5
      sw-bundle:       0.0.5
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      architecture:    aarch64
      processor:       apq8096
      os:              GNU/Linux
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      voxl-utils:
      Package: voxl-utils
      Version: 0.4.6
      Status: install user installed
      Architecture: aarch64
      Installed-Time: 246
      
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      

      Any help or direction on what to check next is greatly appreciated.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • modaltbM
        modaltb ModalAI Team
        last edited by

        Thanks for the post! You are user #1 😉

        We made a change to voxl-vision-px4 some time back and I'm wondering if you are caught in the middle.

        https://gitlab.com/voxl-public/voxl-vision-px4/-/commit/e9259cff0ee61f320edd3b40ab01cf715715c8a7

        "Older" (a few months back) version of the program expected all traffic over port 14550, since then we've split up traffic for 14550 for external clients (e.g. QGC) and 14551 for onboard traffic.

        Notice here we are using 14551:
        https://gitlab.com/voxl-public/mavros_test/-/blob/master/run_mavros.sh#L7

        I wonder if updating this on your system to 14550 will get you going?

        The other option is to update the system image and then software suite to get the latest, if this is an option let me know.
        Thanks!
        Travis

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • V
          vaughanje
          last edited by

          The change of port worked for me. Thank you for the help.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • First post
            Last post
          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors