ModalAI Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Stereo camera point cloud

    VOXL-CAM
    4
    8
    614
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G
      gauravshukla914
      last edited by

      HI, I have a VOXL flight deck with me with stereo,tracking and hi-res cameras. I want to visualise the point-cloud date from the stereo cameras. As of now, I'm having a hard time visualizing one in rviz. When I run the camera feed, on doing rostopic list, I get one of the topics as /dfs_pointcloud. However, I'm unable to see any pointcloud data on Rviz. Looking for some help on this.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        A Former User
        last edited by

        Hello @gauravshukla914 ,

        If you are not dependent on ROS for visualization, you can use the latest dev version of voxl-portal to view pointclouds in a web browser.

        However, if you can see the topic via rostopic list you should be able to view in rviz as well (with the "fixed frame" set to world). Can you share any errors or messages from rviz when you attempt to view?

        D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          Darshan @Guest
          last edited by

          Hello @Matt-Turi ,
          I am facing the same issue, am unable to get dense pointcloud data on /dfs_pointcloud rostopic. I tried to visualize detected object point cloud data on rviz, but the point cloud data coming on /dfs_pointcloud was not dense and clear. I tried the same approach for different physical dimensions of objects. Still data coming on rostopic is not clear. I have attached the raw images which have been taken during the process. Suggest me if i need to tune any params or need to follow any different installation instructions.Screenshot from 2022-02-07 17-01-51.png Screenshot from 2022-02-07 15-58-27.png

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ?
            A Former User
            last edited by

            Hi @Darshan

            Can you look at the dfs_disparity or dfs_disparity_scaled images to help see if the issue lies with the actual dfs math or the visualization? Additionally, can you post the output of voxl-version, it looks like you may be on an older version of our software suite and an update may help.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              Darshan
              last edited by

              Hi @Alex-Gardner,
              Am using ModalAI 3.3.0 version. I have connected my voxel camera kit with ros & able to visualise dfs_disparity/image_raw topic, stereo_left/image_raw, dfs_pointcloud topics data on Rviz. I have placed a obstacle in front of camera & at same time i tried visualise obstacle data on /dfs_disparity/image_raw topic. Observed that the data appears on dfs_disparity/image_raw topic was not clear and may due to this am getting very low density pointcloud points on /dfs_pointcloud topic. I have attached the rviz images which have taken during experiment.(image 2.png image1.png image url)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                Darshan
                last edited by

                Hi,
                Any suggestions for resolving this issue!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  A Former User
                  last edited by

                  It looks in these screenshots like the pointcloud is accurately reflecting the disparity image output by the dfs algorithm. The default settings for our DFS algorithm was used for 3d mapping/obstacle avoidance, where we want less noisy(and as a result less sharp) data. Thus we apply two fairly hefty median filters (a 17 pixel one and then a 7 pixel one). You can modify the intensity of these (or completely disable) in /etc/modalai/voxl-dfs-server.conf. Additionally, you can increase the number of disparity levels for more data (though you will see significant increases in cpu usage by the algorithm if you do so).

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    Darshan
                    last edited by

                    Hi @Alex-Gardner,

                    I followed to tune params which you suggested in above, but still am not able get optimal dense pointcloud points. Is there any alternative approach in need to follow or i need combine any other depth sensor along with existing stereo.![alt text](points.png image url).

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    Powered by NodeBB | Contributors