<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Starling 2 Max back-right motor clicking and reduced RPM — suspected magnet delamination]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi ModalAI team,</p>
<p dir="auto">Sales recommended that I post this issue here for technical review.</p>
<p dir="auto">We identified a mechanical fault in the back-right motor of our ModalAI Starling 2 Max, mapped to ESC ID 3. The motor produces a repeatable clicking/rubbing sound during rotation, and visual inspection appears to show a displaced or delaminated internal magnet.</p>
<p dir="auto">We have removed the aircraft from flight testing and are requesting guidance regarding motor replacement or RMA.</p>
<h2>System details</h2>
<ul>
<li>Aircraft: ModalAI Starling 2 Max</li>
<li>Compute/autopilot: VOXL 2 / QRB5165</li>
<li>ESC: ModalAI 4-in-1 ESC, M0129-6, board version 44</li>
<li>ESC firmware: 39.25</li>
<li><code>voxl-px4</code>: 1.14.0-2.0.138</li>
<li><code>voxl-esc</code>: 1.6.2</li>
<li>VOXL ESC tools binary: 1.10</li>
<li>Affected motor: back-right</li>
<li>Mapped ESC ID: 3</li>
</ul>
<h2>Mechanical observation</h2>
<p dir="auto">The back-right motor clicks or rubs at a repeatable point during rotation. The clicking became more pronounced during the first powered low-power test, so we stopped testing the suspect motor after that point.</p>
<p dir="auto">The suspect motor and a known-good motor both measured approximately <strong>0.5 ohm phase resistance</strong>. We understand that matching winding resistance does not rule out a mechanical or magnetic fault.</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1782387603517-01_back_right_motor_closeup.jpg" alt="Back-right motor close-up" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto"><em>Close-up of the suspect back-right motor.</em></p>
<h2>Props-off low-power comparison</h2>
<p dir="auto">This was not an ESC calibration or a thrust test. It was only a comparative motor-health check with:</p>
<ul>
<li>all propellers removed,</li>
<li>the aircraft secured,</li>
<li><code>voxl-px4</code> stopped,</li>
<li>each motor tested individually,</li>
<li>and the same initial low-power command applied to each motor.</li>
</ul>
<table class="table table-bordered table-striped">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Motor position</th>
<th style="text-align:right">ESC ID</th>
<th style="text-align:right">Average RPM at first valid low-power point</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Back-left</td>
<td style="text-align:right">0</td>
<td style="text-align:right">1699.79 RPM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Front-left</td>
<td style="text-align:right">1</td>
<td style="text-align:right">1770.04 RPM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Front-right</td>
<td style="text-align:right">2</td>
<td style="text-align:right">1755.47 RPM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Back-right — suspect</strong></td>
<td style="text-align:right"><strong>3</strong></td>
<td style="text-align:right"><strong>1482.49 RPM</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p dir="auto">The good-motor median was approximately <strong>1755.47 RPM</strong>. The back-right motor was therefore approximately <strong>15.6% below the good-motor median</strong> at the same command.</p>
<p dir="auto">The raw test log also records that the clicking worsened during this test, so we did not continue with higher-power points on the suspect motor. The other three motors completed additional low-power sweep points without the same mechanical symptom.</p>
<p dir="auto"><strong>Image 2 — close-up frame sequence</strong></p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1782388718139-02_back_right_motor_closeup_sequence.jpg" alt="02_back_right_motor_closeup_sequence.jpg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto"><strong>Image 3 — props-off bench-test setup</strong></p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1782388753461-03_props_off_bench_test_setup.jpg" alt="03_props_off_bench_test_setup.jpg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<h2>Current assessment</h2>
<p dir="auto">At this point, we do not consider the back-right motor safe to fly.</p>
<p dir="auto">The conclusion is based on the combination of:</p>
<ul>
<li>repeatable mechanical clicking/rubbing,</li>
<li>apparent magnet displacement or delamination,</li>
<li>reduced RPM at the same command,</li>
<li>and worsening clicking during the powered test.</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">We plan to replace the motor before conducting any further hover testing.</p>
<h2>Questions</h2>
<p dir="auto">Could the ModalAI team please advise:</p>
<ol>
<li>Does this appear consistent with a delaminated motor magnet or another internal rotor fault?</li>
<li>Would you recommend replacing only the motor, or should we also inspect or test the ESC channel, wiring, and motor mount?</li>
<li>Is this appropriate for a replacement or RMA request?</li>
<li>Is there a specific low-power validation procedure you recommend after installing the replacement motor?</li>
<li>Would the raw VOXL ESC logs, mapping CSV, and full sweep data be useful for your review?</li>
</ol>
<h2>Supporting material</h2>
<p dir="auto">Attached or available:</p>
<ul>
<li>close-up video showing the clicking/rubbing,</li>
<li>powered props-off bench-test video,</li>
<li>close-up still images,</li>
<li>ESC-to-motor mapping,</li>
<li>raw VOXL ESC logs,</li>
<li>comparison CSV,</li>
<li>and a PDF engineering evidence report.</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">Thank you for reviewing this. We can upload any additional logs or hardware information that would help with the diagnosis.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.modalai.com/topic/5295/starling-2-max-back-right-motor-clicking-and-reduced-rpm-suspected-magnet-delamination</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 16:37:35 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.modalai.com/topic/5295.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 12:07:39 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>