<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Multiple simultaneous VIO solutions, or other redundant localization methods]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Was searching around for info on this and found from ~6mos ago: Re: <a href="/topic/1590/redundant-vio-via-apriltags">Redundant VIO via AprilTags?</a></p>
<p dir="auto">Are there any status updates on this? <a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/evan-hertafeld" aria-label="Profile: Evan-Hertafeld">@<bdi>Evan-Hertafeld</bdi></a>'s idea of configuring two simultaneous VIO services is something we've been considering over here, in addition to other redundant feature based localization solutions. Alternately, have you run EKF-SLAM or similar onboard the VOXL or just made maps based on VIO position and voxblox as implied in <a href="https://www.modalai.com/blogs/blog/slam-the-l-is-for-localization-the-m-is-for-mapping" rel="nofollow ugc">this article?</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.modalai.com/topic/2234/multiple-simultaneous-vio-solutions-or-other-redundant-localization-methods</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:01:08 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.modalai.com/topic/2234.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2023 21:30:15 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>